The inhomogeneous minimum of quadratic forms of signature ± 1

1981 ◽  
Vol 89 (2) ◽  
pp. 225-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Madhu Raka

Let Qr be a real indefinite quadratic form in r variables of determinant D ≠ 0 and of type (r1, r2), 0 < r1 < r, r = r1 + r2, S = r1 − r2 being the signature of Qr. It is known (e.g. Blaney (3)) that, given any real numbers c1, c2,…, cr, there exists a constant C depending only on r and s such that the inequalityhas a solution in integers x1, x2, …, xr.

Author(s):  
Madhu Raka

The famous conjecture of Watson(11) on the minima of indefinite quadratic forms in n variables has been proved for n ≤ 5, n ≥ 21 and for signatures 0 and ± 1. For the details and history of the conjecture the reader is referred to the author's paper(8). In the succeeding paper (9), we prove Watson's conjecture for signature ± 2 and ± 3 and for all n. Thus only one case for n = 6 (i.e. forms of type (1, 5) or (5, 1)) remains to he proved which we do here; thereby completing the case n = 6. This result is also used in (9) for proving the conjecture for all quadratic forms of signature ± 4. More precisely, here we prove:Theorem 1. Let Q6(x1, …, x6) be a real indefinite quadratic form in six variables of determinant D ( < 0) and of type (5, 1) or (1, 5). Then given any real numbers ci, 1 ≤ i ≤ 6, there exist integers x1,…, x6such that


1967 ◽  
Vol 63 (2) ◽  
pp. 277-290 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwa Chander Dumir

Let Q (x1, …, xn) be a real indefinite quadratic form in n-variables x1,…, xn with signature (r, s),r + s = n and determinant D ≠ 0. Then it is known (see Blaney (2)) that there exists constant Cr, s depending only on r, s such that given any real numbers c1, …,cn we can find integers x1, …, xn satisfying


1963 ◽  
Vol 15 ◽  
pp. 412-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. H. H. Chalk

Letbe an indefinite quadratic form in the integer variables x1, . . . , xn with real coefficients of determinant D = ||ars||(n) ≠ 0. The homogeneous minimum MH(Qn) and the inhomogeneous minimum MI(Qn) of Qn(x) are defined as follows :


1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwa Chander Dumir

Let Q(x1, …, xn) be an indefinite quadratic form in n-variables with real coefficients, determinant D ≠ 0 and signature (r, s), r+s = n. Then it is known (e.g. see Blaney [2]) that there exist constants Γr, s depending only on r and s such for any real numbers c1, …, cn we can find integers x1, …, xn satisfying


Author(s):  
Madhu Raka

Let Qn be a real indefinite quadratic form in n variables x1, x2,…, xn, of determinant D ≠ 0 and of type (r, s), 0 < r < n, n = r + s. Let σ denote the signature of Qn so that σ = r − s. It is known (see e.g. Blaney(4)) that, given any real numbers c1 c2, …, cn, there exists a constant C depending upon n and σ only such that the inequalityhas a solution in integers x1, x2, …, xn. Let Cr, s denote the infimum of all such constants. Clearly Cr, s = Cs, r, so we need consider non-negative signatures only. For n = 2, C1, 1 = ¼ follows from a classical result of Minkowski on the product of two linear forms. When n = 3, Davenport (5) proved that C2, 1 = 27/100. For all n and σ = 0, Birch (3) proved that Cr, r = ¼. In 1962, Watson(18) determined the values of Cr, s for all n ≥ 21 and for all signatures σ. He proved thatWatson also conjectured that (1·2) holds for all n ≥ 4. Dumir(6) proved Watson's conjecture for n = 4. For n = 5, it was proved by Hans-Gill and Madhu Raka(7, 8). The author (12) has proved the conjecture for σ = 1 and all n. In the preceding paper (13) we proved that C5, 1 = 1. In this paper we prove Watson's conjecture for σ = 2, 3 and 4.


1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 287-303 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vishwa Chander Dumir

In a previous paper [4] we showed that Γ3,1 = 16/. For the definition of Γr, s for an indefinite quadratic form in n = r + s variables of the type (r, s) see the above paper. Here we shall show that Γ2,2 = 16. More precisely we prove: Theorem. Let Q (x, y, z, t) be an indefinite quaternary quadratic form with determinant D > 0 and signature (2, 2). Then given any real numbers x0, y0, z0, t0 we can find integers x, y, z, t such thatEquality is necessary if and only if either where ρ ≠ 0. For Q1 equality occurs if and only if


1961 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. S. Barnes

If f(x) is a real indefinite quadratic form in n variables with determinant d ≠ 0, we set for any real α.


1948 ◽  
Vol 44 (4) ◽  
pp. 457-462
Author(s):  
J. W. S. Cassels

1. Letwhere a > 0, be an indefinite quadratic form, so that d = b2 − 4ac > 0. A classical theorem of Minkowski states that, if (x0, y0) is any pair of real numbers, there are numbers (x, y) congruent (mod 1) to (x0, y0), such thatand, more recently, Davenport has shown that this theorem can be sharpened for certain special f, for instance that it is always possible to satisfy


1955 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 337-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. P. Bambah ◽  
K. Rogers

1. Introduction. Several authors have proved theorems of the following type:Let x0, y0 be any real numbers. Then for certain functions f(x, y), there exist numbers x, y such that1.1 x ≡ x0, y ≡ y0 (mod 1),and1.2 .The first result of this type, but with replaced by min , was given by Barnes (3) for the case when the function is an indefinite binary quadratic form. A generalisation of this was proved by elementary geometry by K. Rogers (6).


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document