Reality Check for Researchers

PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 54 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lowell Brubaker
Keyword(s):  
Reality Check

Spoofing Threats: Reality Check, Impact and Cure

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wim De Wilde ◽  
Jan Van Hees ◽  
Gert Cuypers ◽  
Jan Dumon ◽  
Jean-Marie Sleewaegen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reality Check

Reality Check: What effect will third-party reviews have on the IH community?

The Synergist ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 9 (9) ◽  
pp. 23
Author(s):  
Hope Katz Gibbs
Keyword(s):  
Third Party ◽  
Reality Check

U.S. Intelligence: Reality check

2004 ◽  
Vol 60 (3) ◽  
pp. 15-17
Author(s):  
John Prados
Keyword(s):  
Reality Check

Reality Check on OpenMP Implementations

2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirley Moore ◽  
Daniel Pressel ◽  
Juan C. Chaves
Keyword(s):  
Reality Check

Reality Check on Officer Liability

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lyman P. Q. Johnson ◽  
Rob Ricca
Keyword(s):  
Reality Check

Reducing road congestion: a reality check—a comment

2004 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia L Mokhtarian
Keyword(s):  
Road Congestion ◽  
Reality Check

scholarly journals Can the FSCORE add value to anomaly-based portfolios? A reality check in the German stock market

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eero J. Pätäri ◽  
Timo H. Leivo ◽  
Sheraz Ahmed
Keyword(s):  
Stock Market ◽  
Trading Strategies ◽  
Added Value ◽  
Financial Statement ◽  
Research Setting ◽  
Holding Period ◽  
Reality Check ◽  
German Stock ◽  
Overall Performance ◽  
German Stock Market

AbstractThis paper examines the added value of using financial statement information, particularly that of Piotroski’s (J Account Res 38:1, 2000. https://doi.org/10.2307/2672906) FSCORE, for equity portfolio selection in the German stock market in a realistic research setting in which the critique against the implementability of FSCORE-based trading strategies is taken into account. We show that the performance of annually rebalanced long-only portfolios formed on any of the examined 12 accounting-based primary criteria improves by including the FSCORE as a supplementary criterion. Our study is the first to show that although the FSCORE boost is strongest for the 1-year holding period length, it also holds, on average, for the 3-year holding period. The use of a 3-year updating frequency is particularly beneficial for the low-accrual portfolio that—when supplemented with the high-FSCORE threshold—generates the best overall performance among all 75 portfolios examined. Moreover, we show that a high FSCORE is also an efficient stand-alone criterion for long-only portfolio formation.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document