Facilitative Effects of Disrupted Sequence Learning on Prospective Memory Retrieval: Support for the Discrepancy Hypothesis

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji Ha Lee ◽  
Julie Bugg ◽  
Mark A. McDaniel
2011 ◽  
Vol 219 (2) ◽  
pp. 92-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Babett Voigt ◽  
Ingo Aberle ◽  
Judith Schönfeld ◽  
Matthias Kliegel

The present study examined age differences in time-based prospective memory (TBPM) in primary school age children and tested the role of self-initiated memory retrieval and strategic time monitoring (TM) as possible developmental mechanisms. Fifty-four children were recruited from local primary schools (27 younger children, mean age = 7.2 ± 0.55 years, and 27 older children, mean age = 9.61 ± 0.71 years). The task was a driving game scenario in which children had to drive a vehicle (ongoing task) and to remember to refuel before the vehicle runs out of gas (TBPM task, i.e., the fuel gauge served as child-appropriate time equivalent). Fuel gauge was either displayed permanently (low level of self-initiation) or could only be viewed on demand by hitting a button (high level of self-initiation). The results revealed age-dependent TBPM differences with better performance in older children. In contrast, level of self-initiated memory retrieval did not affect TBPM performance. However, strategies of TM influenced TBPM, as more frequent time checking was related to better performance. Patterns of time checking frequency differed according to children’s age and course of the game, suggesting difficulties in maintaining initial strategic TM in younger children. Taken together, the study revealed ongoing development of TBPM across primary school age. Observed age differences seemed to be associated with the ability to maintain strategic monitoring.


Memory ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 679-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Marsh ◽  
Gene A. Brewer ◽  
John Paul Jameson ◽  
Gabriel I. Cook ◽  
Nader Amir ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley J. Scolaro ◽  
Annalisa Cohen ◽  
Robert L. West

2011 ◽  
Vol 49 (12) ◽  
pp. 3494-3504 ◽  
Author(s):  
Florentina Mattli ◽  
Jacqueline Zöllig ◽  
Robert West

2017 ◽  
Vol 70 (10) ◽  
pp. 1997-2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason L. Hicks ◽  
Bryan A. Franks ◽  
Samantha N. Spitler

We explored the nature of focal versus nonfocal event-based prospective memory retrieval. In the context of a lexical decision task, people received an intention to respond to a single word (focal) in one condition and to a category label (nonfocal) for the other condition. Participants experienced both conditions, and their order was manipulated. The focal instruction condition was a single word presented multiple times. In Experiment 1, the stimuli in the nonfocal condition were different exemplars from a category, each presented once. In the nonfocal condition retrieval was poorer and reaction times were slower during the ongoing task as compared to the focal condition, replicating prior findings. In Experiment 2, the stimulus in the nonfocal condition was a single category exemplar repeated multiple times. When this single-exemplar nonfocal condition followed in time the single-item focal condition, focal versus nonfocal performance was virtually indistinguishable. These results demonstrate that people can modify their stimulus processing and expectations in event-based prospective memory tasks based on experience with the nature of prospective cues and with the ongoing task.


1995 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 631-648 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Chiara Passolunghi ◽  
Maria A. Brandimonte ◽  
Cesare Cornoldi

In three experiments, we investigated the effects of different cue encoding modalities on young and older children's prospective memory. In Experiments 1 and 2, younger subjects showed the highest performance when the cue prompting the action was visually presented, whereas older children's performance benefited from enactment of the response. However, results from Experiment 3 showed that, under conditions which emphasise the link between the cue and the action to be performed, even younger children's memory benefits from motoric enactment of the response. These results are discussed in terms of the development of specific integration processes necessary for prospective memory retrieval.


2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (5) ◽  
pp. 923-935
Author(s):  
Jason L. Hicks ◽  
Samantha N. Spitler ◽  
Megan H. Papesh

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document