Monitoring False Recognition on Criterial Recollection Tests: Distinctheness Heuristic Versus Criterion Shifts

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Gallo ◽  
Jonathan A. Weiss ◽  
Daniel L. Schacter
2001 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 579-586 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Gallo ◽  
Henry L. Roediger ◽  
Kathleen B. McDermott

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angela M. Maguire ◽  
Michael S. Humphreys ◽  
Simon Dennis

Memory ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 14 (6) ◽  
pp. 742-761 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffery J. Starns ◽  
Jason L. Hicks ◽  
Richard L. Marsh

Author(s):  
Matthew P. Gerrie ◽  
Maryanne Garry

When people see movies with some parts missing, they falsely recognize many of the missing parts later. In two experiments, we examined the effect of warnings on people’s false memories for these parts. In Experiment 1, warning subjects about false recognition before the movie (forewarnings) reduced false recognition, but warning them after the movie (postwarnings) reduced false recognition to a lesser extent. In Experiment 2, the effect of the warnings depended on the nature of the missing parts. Forewarnings were more effective than postwarnings in reducing false recognition of missing noncrucial parts, but forewarnings and postwarnings were similarly effective in reducing false recognition of crucial missing parts. We use the source monitoring framework to explain our results.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martha D. Amberg ◽  
John P. Taylor ◽  
Susan Hambrick ◽  
William P. Wallace
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document