forced choice
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

1221
(FIVE YEARS 227)

H-INDEX

56
(FIVE YEARS 5)

Cognition ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 219 ◽  
pp. 104978
Author(s):  
Hauke S. Meyerhoff ◽  
Nina A. Gehrer ◽  
Simon Merz ◽  
Christian Frings

Sexes ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
pp. 59-67
Author(s):  
Farid Pazhoohi ◽  
Ray Garza ◽  
Alan Kingstone

Previous research has shown that women may use self-enhancement strategies to compete with one other. Lumbar curvature in women is considered to enhance a woman′s attractiveness, potentially due to its role in bipedal fetal load and sexual receptiveness. The current study investigated the role of lumbar curvature on women’s perceptions of sexual receptiveness as well as its role in women’s intrasexual competitiveness. Study 1 (N = 138) tested and confirmed that women’s intrasexual competition influences their perception of sexual receptivity of women as a function of lordosis posture depicted in a standing posture. Study 2 (N = 69) replicated these results and extended them to other postures, namely, the quadruped and supine positions. Study 3 (N = 106), using a two-alternative forced-choice task, revealed that other women perceive relatively larger arched-back postures as more threatening to their relationship and frequently as being more attractive. Collectively, this work suggests that women consider a lordotic posture in other women as a signal of sexual receptivity and perceive it as a threat to their relationship. This research provides robust support for the sexually receptivity hypothesis of lumbar curvature, questioning the alternative morphological vertebral wedging hypothesis.


Revue Romane ◽  
2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Belligh ◽  
Ludovic De Cuypere ◽  
Claudia Crocco

Abstract In this article we study the alternation between the two most prominent Italian thetic and sentence-focus constructions, viz. the Syntactic Inversion Construction (henceforth: SIC), e.g. Arriva il treno (‘The train is arriving’), and the Presentational Cleft (henceforth: PC), e.g. C’è il treno che arriva (‘The train is arriving’). Based on the existing literature on the two constructions and drawing inspiration from a number of cognitive-functional hypotheses pertaining to constraints on the amount of referentially new constituents that can be conveyed in a single clause, we put forward the hypothesis that Italian language users are more likely to prefer the PC over the SIC if the utterance involves a high number of referentially new constituents. To assess this hypothesis, we constructed a pilot experiment consisting of a 100-split forced choice task that was administered by means of an online questionnaire to 66 native speaker participants. The results of the experiment indicate that the preference for the PC indeed increases if the number of referentially new constituents is higher. This is however not the only factor involved in the alternation and the preference of the language users seems not only to be determined by the number of referentially new constituents, but also by their syntactic status.


2022 ◽  
pp. 001316442110699
Author(s):  
Hung-Yu Huang

The forced-choice (FC) item formats used for noncognitive tests typically develop a set of response options that measure different traits and instruct respondents to make judgments among these options in terms of their preference to control the response biases that are commonly observed in normative tests. Diagnostic classification models (DCMs) can provide information regarding the mastery status of test takers on latent discrete variables and are more commonly used for cognitive tests employed in educational settings than for noncognitive tests. The purpose of this study is to develop a new class of DCM for FC items under the higher-order DCM framework to meet the practical demands of simultaneously controlling for response biases and providing diagnostic classification information. By conducting a series of simulations and calibrating the model parameters with a Bayesian estimation, the study shows that, in general, the model parameters can be recovered satisfactorily with the use of long tests and large samples. More attributes improve the precision of the second-order latent trait estimation in a long test, but decrease the classification accuracy and the estimation quality of the structural parameters. When statements are allowed to load on two distinct attributes in paired comparison items, the specific-attribute condition produces better a parameter estimation than the overlap-attribute condition. Finally, an empirical analysis related to work-motivation measures is presented to demonstrate the applications and implications of the new model.


Psychometrika ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susanne Frick

AbstractThe multidimensional forced-choice (MFC) format has been proposed to reduce faking because items within blocks can be matched on desirability. However, the desirability of individual items might not transfer to the item blocks. The aim of this paper is to propose a mixture item response theory model for faking in the MFC format that allows to estimate the fakability of MFC blocks, termed the Faking Mixture model. Given current computing capabilities, within-subject data from both high- and low-stakes contexts are needed to estimate the model. A simulation showed good parameter recovery under various conditions. An empirical validation showed that matching was necessary but not sufficient to create an MFC questionnaire that can reduce faking. The Faking Mixture model can be used to reduce fakability during test construction.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Natasha Jayne Scott ◽  
Mawada Ghanem ◽  
Brianna Beck ◽  
Andrew Martin

Our everyday actions and their subsequent outcomes are accompanied by a feeling of control or agency. This sense of agency (SoA) is dependent on the contribution of both prospective factors (e.g., action choice), and retrospective factors (e.g., outcome valence) with considerable variation in the population. We manipulated freedom of choice and valence of outcome to assess the relationship between implicit SoA and subclinical depressive and psychosis-like traits in a cohort of healthy young adults. Participants (N=150) completed a Libet Clock task, in which they had either a free or forced choice of which of two buttons to press, and received either a positive or negative outcome (cash register or klaxon). Participants were required to judge the time on the clock the tone sounded. We measured outcome binding, the shift in the perceived time of the outcome back in time towards the moment of the action. Participants also completed questionnaires on both depressive and psychosis-like traits. Positive outcomes strongly increased intentional binding. The evidence favoured no effect of freedom of choice on average, but this was influenced by inter-individual differences. Individuals reporting more depressive traits had less of a difference in intentional binding between free and forced choice conditions. The findings show that implicit SoA is sensitive to outcome valence and differs across the subclinical depression continuum.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olimpia Matarazzo ◽  
Lucia Abbamonte ◽  
Claudia Greco ◽  
Barbara Pizzini ◽  
Giovanna Nigro

Objectives: The mainstream position on regret in psychological literature is that its necessary conditions are agency and responsibility, that is, to choose freely but badly. Without free choice, other emotions, such as disappointment, are deemed to be elicited when the outcome is worse than expected. In two experiments, we tested the opposite hypothesis that being forced by external circumstances to choose an option inconsistent with one’s own intentions is an important source of regret and a core component of its phenomenology, regardless of the positivity/negativity of the post-decision outcome. Along with regret, four post-decision emotions – anger toward oneself, disappointment, anger toward circumstances, and satisfaction – were investigated to examine their analogies and differences to regret with regard to antecedents, appraisals, and phenomenological aspects.Methods: Through the scenario methodology, we manipulated three variables: choice (free/forced), outcome (positive/negative), and time (short/long time after decision-making). Moreover, we investigated whether responsibility, decision justifiability, and some phenomenological aspects (self-attribution, other attribution, and contentment) mediated the effect exerted by choice, singularly or in interaction with outcome and time, on the five emotions. Each study was conducted with 336 participants, aged 18–60.Results: The results of both studies were similar and supported our hypothesis. In particular, regret elicited by forced choice was always high, regardless of the valence of outcome, whereas free choice elicited regret was high only with a negative outcome. Moreover, regret was unaffected by responsibility and decision justifiability, whereas it was affected by the three phenomenological dimensions.Conclusion: Our results suggest that (1) the prevailing theory of regret is too binding, since it posits as necessary some requirements which are not; (2) the antecedents and phenomenology of regret are broader than it is generally believed; (3) decision-making produces a complex emotional constellation, where the different emotions, singularly and/or in combination, constitute the affective responses to the different aspects of decision-making.


2021 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
Flavien Ganter

Abstract Forced-choice conjoint experiments have become a standard component of the experimental toolbox in political science and sociology. Yet the literature has largely overlooked the fact that conjoint experiments can be used for two distinct purposes: to uncover respondents’ multidimensional preferences, and to estimate the causal effects of some attributes on a profile’s selection probability in a multidimensional choice setting. This paper makes the argument that this distinction is both analytically and practically relevant, because the quantity of interest is contingent on the purpose of the study. The vast majority of social scientists relying on conjoint analyses, including most scholars interested in studying preferences, have adopted the average marginal component effect (AMCE) as their main quantity of interest. The paper shows that the AMCE is neither conceptually nor practically suited to explore respondents’ preferences. Not only is it essentially a causal quantity conceptually at odds with the goal of describing patterns of preferences, but it also does generally not identify preferences, mixing them with compositional effects unrelated to preferences. This paper proposes a novel estimand—the average component preference—designed to explore patterns of preferences, and it presents a method for estimating it.


2021 ◽  
Vol 183 ◽  
pp. 111114
Author(s):  
Goran Pavlov ◽  
Dexin Shi ◽  
Alberto Maydeu-Olivares ◽  
Amanda Fairchild

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 656-657
Author(s):  
Karl Grewal ◽  
Michaella Trites ◽  
Megan O'Connell ◽  
Andrew Kirk ◽  
Stuart MacDonald ◽  
...  

Abstract Effort testing is critical to neuropsychological practice, including dementia assessment. Questions exist around whether cognitive status or impairment severity impacts effort test performance in this population. Presently, we examined whether scores on an embedded effort test - the California Verbal Learning Test II Short Form (CVLT-II-SF) Forced Choice Recognition (FCR) - differed across diagnostic cognitive status groups and how severity of impairment modulated test performance. In a sample of memory clinic patients, three cognitive status groups were identified: subjective cognitive impairment (SCI; n = 92), amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI; n = 18), and dementia due to Alzheimer’s Disease (AD; n = 70). Significant group differences in FCR performance were observed using one-way ANOVA (p < .001), with post-hoc analysis indicating the AD group performed significantly worse scores than the other groups. Using multiple regression, FCR performance was modelled as a function of cognitive status, impairment severity indexed MMSE, and their interaction, with a parallel analysis for the Clinical Dementia Rating Sum of Boxes (CDR-SOB) scores as an alternate severity measure. Results yielded significant main effects for MMSE (p = 0.019) and cognitive status (p = 0.026), as well as a significant interaction (p = 0.021). Thus, increases in impairment severity disproportionately impaired FCR performance for persons with AD, calling into question research-based cut scores for effort determination in dementia contexts. Corresponding CDR-SOB analyses were non-significant. Future research should examine whether CVLT-II-SF-FCR is an appropriately specific inclusion in a best-practice testing battery for evaluating effort in dementia populations.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document