The architecture of empathy: The relative roles of reinforcement sensitivity and basic tendencies

2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Conrad Baldner ◽  
Mark Scott
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serafine Dierickx ◽  
Dirk Smits ◽  
Philip J. Corr ◽  
Penelope Hasking ◽  
Laurence Claes

2016 ◽  
Vol 48 (3) ◽  
pp. 258
Author(s):  
Mengting YING ◽  
Guangrong JIANG ◽  
Lixia YU ◽  
Ting LU

Author(s):  
Herman van Brenk ◽  
Barbara Majoor ◽  
Arnold M. Wright

Despite concerns that profit-sharing plans might have a detrimental effect on audit quality, there is little empirical evidence on this issue. We examine the effects of the type of profit-sharing plan, level of client importance, and auditor reinforcement sensitivity (joint sensitivity to rewards and punishments) on auditor reporting decisions. By relying on agency theory and reinforcement sensitivity theory, we posit that the joint effects of profit sharing and client importance on auditors' decisions are contingent on reinforcement sensitivity. In an experiment with 450 audit partners and managers, we manipulate type of profit-sharing plan and client importance, and measure extroversion and neuroticism. We find the highest audit quality when profit sharing is based on firm performance, client importance is low, and reinforcement sensitivity is high. Thus, instead of just modifying the type of profit-sharing plans, it is the mix of economic incentives and personality traits that affect audit quality.


2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 320-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luke D. Smillie ◽  
Alan D. Pickering ◽  
Chris J. Jackson

In this article, we review recent modifications to Jeffrey Gray's (1973, 1991) reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST), and attempt to draw implications for psychometric measurement of personality traits. First, we consider Gray and McNaughton's (2000) functional revisions to the biobehavioral systems of RST. Second, we evaluate recent clarifications relating to interdependent effects that these systems may have on behavior, in addition to or in place of separable effects (e.g., Corr, 2001; Pickering, 1997). Finally, we consider ambiguities regarding the exact trait dimension to which Gray's “reward system” corresponds. From this review, we suggest that future work is needed to distinguish psychometric measures of (a) fear from anxiety and (b) reward-reactivity from trait impulsivity. We also suggest, on the basis of interdependent system views of RST and associated exploration using formal models, that traits that are based upon RST are likely to have substantial intercorrelations. Finally, we advise that more substantive work is required to define relevant constructs and behaviors in RST before we can be confident in our psychometric measures of them.


2011 ◽  
Vol 50 (5) ◽  
pp. 729-734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geir Scott Brunborg ◽  
Bjørn Helge Johnsen ◽  
Rune Aune Mentzoni ◽  
Helge Molde ◽  
Ståle Pallesen

2012 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 345-356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig R. Colder ◽  
Larry W. Hawk ◽  
Liliana J. Lengua ◽  
William Wiezcorek ◽  
Rina Das Eiden ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document