The list-strength effect (LSE) and global matching models

1991 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bennet B. Murdock
Keyword(s):  
List Strength ◽  
Global Matching ◽  
List Strength Effect ◽  
Matching Models ◽  
Strength Effect

scholarly journals Global matching models of recognition memory

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam F Osth ◽  
Simon Dennis
Keyword(s):  
Recognition Memory ◽  
Decision Process ◽  
Computational Models ◽  
List Strength ◽  
Recent Developments ◽  
Global Matching ◽  
List Strength Effect ◽  
Matching Models ◽  
Global Similarity ◽  
Strength Effect

How does retrieval take place in recognition memory? A number of computational models have been developed that posit that recognition operates by a process of global matching, wherein the cue is compared to each stored memory. These cue-to-memory similarities are then aggregated to produce an index of the global similarity between the cue and the contents of memory which can then be subjected to a decision process. In this chapter, we describe a.) the theoretical rationale and successes of such models, such as their accounts of similarity and list-length effects and generalization to multiple memory tasks, b.) challenges and hurdles they have experienced, including the null list-strength effect, the mirror effect, and the extralist feature effect, and c.) recent developments, such as extensions to predictions about response latency, sources of interference outside of the study list, and integration of more realistic representations.

scholarly journals The list strength effect in source memory: Data and a global matching model

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Osth ◽  
Julian Fox ◽  
Meredith McKague ◽  
Andrew Heathcote ◽  
Simon Dennis
Keyword(s):  
Source Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Mixed List ◽  
Item Recognition ◽  
Analysis Experiment ◽  
List Strength ◽  
Global Matching ◽  
List Strength Effect ◽  
Strength Effect ◽  
Ensemble Representations

A critical constraint on models of item recognition comes from the list strength paradigm, in which a proportion of items are strengthened to observe the effect on the non-strengthened items. In item recognition, it has been widely established that increasing list strength does not impair performance, in that performance of a set of items is unaffected by the strength of the other items on the list. However, to date the effects of list strength manipulations have not been measured in the source memory task. We conducted three source memory experiments where items studied in two sources were presented in a pure weak list, where all items were presented once, and a mixed list, where half of the items in both sources were presented four times. Each experiment varied the nature of the testing format. In Experiment 1, in which each study list was only tested on one task (item recognition or source memory), a list strength effect was found in source memory while anull effect was found for item recognition. Experiments 2 and 3 showed robust null list strength effects when either the test phase (Experiment 2) or the analysis (Experiment 3) was restricted to recognized items. An extension of the Osth and Dennis (2015) model was able to account for the results in both tasks in all experiments by assuming that unrecognized items elicit guess responses in the source memory task and that there was low interference among the studied items. The results were also found to be consistent with a variant of the retrieving effectively from memory model (REM; Shiffrin & Steyvers, 1997) that uses ensemble representations.

scholarly journals The list strength effect in source memory: Data and a global matching model

2018 ◽  
Vol 103 ◽  
pp. 91-113 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam F. Osth ◽  
Julian Fox ◽  
Meredith McKague ◽  
Andrew Heathcote ◽  
Simon Dennis
Keyword(s):  
Source Memory ◽  
Matching Model ◽  
List Strength ◽  
Global Matching ◽  
List Strength Effect ◽  
Strength Effect

scholarly journals The list strength effect in source memory: Data and a global matching model

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam Osth ◽  
Julian Fox ◽  
Meredith McKague ◽  
Andrew Heathcote ◽  
Simon Dennis
Keyword(s):  
Source Memory ◽  
Memory Task ◽  
Mixed List ◽  
Item Recognition ◽  
Null Effect ◽  
Analysis Experiment ◽  
List Strength ◽  
Global Matching ◽  
List Strength Effect ◽  
Strength Effect

A critical constraint on models of item recognition comes from the list strength paradigm, in which a proportion of items are strengthened to observe the effect on the non-strengthened items. In item recognition, it has been widely established that increasing list strength does not impair performance, in that performance of a set of items is unaffected by the strength of the other items on the list. However, to date the effects of list strength manipulations have not been measured in the source memory task. We conducted three source memory experiments where items studied in two sources were presented in a pure weak list, where all items were presented once, and a mixed list, where half of the items in both sources were presented four times. Each experiment varied the nature of the testing format. In Experiment 1, in which each study list was only tested on one task (item recognition or source memory), a list strength effect was found in source memory while a null effect was found for item recognition. Experiments 2 and 3 showed robust null list strength effects when either the test phase (Experiment 2) or the analysis (Experiment 3) was restricted to recognized items. An extension of the Osth and Dennis (2015) model was able to account for the results in both tasks in all experiments by assuming that unrecognized items elicit guess responses in the source memory task and that there was low interference among the studied items. The results were also found to be consistent with a variant of the retrieving effectively from memory model (REM; Shiffrin & Steyvers, 1997) that uses ensemble representations.

scholarly journals The list strength effect: A contextual competition account

2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 1289-1302 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel A. Diana ◽  
Lynne M. Reder
Keyword(s):  
List Strength ◽  
List Strength Effect ◽  
Strength Effect

Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect

2020 ◽  
Vol 67 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-275
Author(s):  
Tyler M. Ensor ◽  
Tyler D. Bancroft ◽  
Dominic Guitard ◽  
Tamra J. Bireta ◽  
William E. Hockley ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Free Recall ◽  
Study List ◽  
Statistical Power ◽  
Sampling Bias ◽  
Output Interference ◽  
List Strength ◽  
List Strength Effect ◽  
Strength Effect

Abstract. Presenting items multiple times on a study list increases their memorability, a process known as item strengthening. The list-strength effect (LSE) refers to the finding that, compared to unstrengthened (pure) lists, lists for which a subset of the items have been strengthened produce enhanced memory for the strengthened items and depressed memory for the unstrengthened items. Although the LSE is found in free recall ( Tulving & Hastie, 1972 ), it does not occur in recognition ( Ratcliff et al., 1990 ). In free recall, the LSE in mixed lists is attributed to a sampling bias promoting priority recall of strong items and consequent output interference affecting weak items. We suggest that, in recognition, the disruption of this pattern through the randomization of test probes is responsible for the null LSE. We present several pilot experiments consistent with this account; however, the registered experiment, which had more statistical power, did not support this account.

List-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms.

1990 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-195 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard M. Shiffrin ◽  
Roger Ratcliff ◽  
Steven E. Clark
Keyword(s):  
List Strength ◽  
List Strength Effect ◽  
Strength Effect

scholarly journals The list strength effect in cued recall

2017 ◽  
Vol 95 ◽  
pp. 78-88 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jack H. Wilson ◽  
Amy H. Criss
Keyword(s):  
Cued Recall ◽  
List Strength ◽  
List Strength Effect ◽  
Strength Effect
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document