scholarly journals Demystifying the Logistics of the Grant Application Process

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-50
Author(s):  
Christopher Moore
1995 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-73
Author(s):  
Wanda K. Johnston

Author(s):  
Claude Potvin

This case deals with the redesign of a standard telecourse - printed material, professional studio video recordings and phone tutoring – into an online course. The redesign involved an adjunct professor in the Humanities having some experience in distance education but little with learning technologies. It was a two-year project including the grant application process. The main issues included replacing television-based content with multimedia content; understanding the complexity of interactions between materials, students, and tutors; and adapting traditional assessment approaches to online instruments and methods.


1992 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona Q. Wood ◽  
V. Lynn Meek ◽  
G. Harman

Hematology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 2002 (1) ◽  
pp. 484-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L.M. Ferrara ◽  
Alvin H. Schmaier

The process of writing an NIH grant application is complex and difficult. Understanding critical details of the review process is a key to success. In this article the authors analyze the NIH grant application process from the reviewer’s perspective. They discuss NIH review criteria and highlight the characteristics of successful grant applications. They also suggest specific strategies to improve applications in terms of timeliness, clarity, focus, and independence and cover the key elements to revising an application that is not funded initially.


2007 ◽  
Vol 22 (11) ◽  
pp. 1587-1595 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karina M. Berg ◽  
Thomas M. Gill ◽  
Arleen F. Brown ◽  
Judy Zerzan ◽  
Joann G. Elmore ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Fenner

Last Tuesday the German Research Foundation (DFG) announced changes to the grant application process, going in effect in July. Researchers are no longer allowed to list all their publications in their grant proposals. ...


Hematology ◽  
2002 ◽  
Vol 2002 (1) ◽  
pp. 484-489 ◽  
Author(s):  
James L.M. Ferrara ◽  
Alvin H. Schmaier

Abstract The process of writing an NIH grant application is complex and difficult. Understanding critical details of the review process is a key to success. In this article the authors analyze the NIH grant application process from the reviewer’s perspective. They discuss NIH review criteria and highlight the characteristics of successful grant applications. They also suggest specific strategies to improve applications in terms of timeliness, clarity, focus, and independence and cover the key elements to revising an application that is not funded initially.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document