Botulinum Toxin Injection Therapy for Abductor Spasmodic Dysphonia

2004 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 10-12
Author(s):  
Christy L. Ludlow
2016 ◽  
Vol 67 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-81
Author(s):  
K. Asano ◽  
Y. Kawashima ◽  
H. Ninomiya ◽  
M. Tai ◽  
M. Sakaguchi ◽  
...  

CSurgeries ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Lava ◽  
Hagit Shoffel-Havakuk ◽  
Michael M Johns III

1997 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 232-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lise Crevier-Buchman ◽  
Ollivier Laccourreye ◽  
Jean-François Papon ◽  
Dominique Nurit ◽  
Daniel Brasnu

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jae Wook Kim ◽  
Jae Hong Park ◽  
Ki Nam Park ◽  
Seung Won Lee

Introduction. This study prospectively evaluates and compares the treatment efficacy of botulinum toxin injection under electromyography guidance (EMG group) and percutaneous botulinum toxin injection under flexible fiberscopic guidance (fiberscopy group).Methods. Thirty patients with adductor spasmodic dysphonia (ADSD), who had never received treatment, were randomly allocated into EMG- or fiberscopy-guided botulinum toxin injections between March 2008 and February 2010. We assessed acoustic and aerodynamic voice parameters, and the voice handicap index (VHI) before injection and at 1, 3, and 6 months after injection.Results. The mean total dosage of botulinum toxin was similar for both groups: 1.7 ± 0.5 U for the EMG group and 1.8 ± 0.4 U for the fiberscopy group (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in outcomes between the two groups in either the duration of effectiveness or complications such as breathy voice and aspiration.Conclusion. Botulinum toxin injection under fiberscopic guidance is a viable alternative to EMG-guided botulinum toxin injection for the treatment of adductor spasmodic dysphonia when EMG equipment is unavailable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document