Erfahrungen der letzten vier Jahre in der Anwendung von Single Incision Slings bei weiblicher Harninkontinenz

2016 ◽  
Vol 76 (04) ◽  
Author(s):  
R Sider ◽  
F Sonnberger ◽  
M Ehrenmüller ◽  
H Enzelsberger
2012 ◽  
pp. 1672-1683
Author(s):  
Michael J. Kennelly ◽  
Erinn Myers

2020 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 187-191
Author(s):  
Matteo Frigerio ◽  
Rodolfo Milani ◽  
Marta Barba ◽  
Luca Locatelli ◽  
Giuseppe Marino ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 714-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omer Bayrak ◽  
Ilker Seckiner ◽  
Gokhan Urgun ◽  
Haluk Sen ◽  
Caglayan Ozcan ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (2) ◽  
pp. 154-156
Author(s):  
Amy L. O'Boyle ◽  
Christopher P. Chung ◽  
Wilma Larsen

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. S30
Author(s):  
P.L. Rosenblatt ◽  
P.M. Lotze ◽  
L.R. Lind ◽  
S.R. Serels

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Priyanka Gupta ◽  
Natalie Gaines ◽  
Kenneth M Peters ◽  
Larry T Sirls

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is the loss of urine caused by increased physical activity such as coughing or exercise. In this review, the anatomy and pathophysiology of SUI are discussed, particularly the presence of a hypermobile urethra. This specific anatomic finding allows the midurethral sling to be a viable surgical option. The evolution and different types of midurethral slings, including retropubic, transobturator, and single-incision slings, are described. We then discuss outcomes of the different types of slings in patients with SUI and special populations, including elderly and obese patients. Finally, we review the complications associated with midurethral slings. This review contains 7 figures, 3 tables, and 110 references. Keywords: complications, elderly, incontinence, intrinsic sphincter deficiency, meshexposure, midurethral sling, mixed incontinence, outcomes, retropubic sling, single-incision sling, stress urinary incontinence, transobturator sling


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document