scholarly journals Saphenous Vein Graft Disease Interventions

2021 ◽  
Vol 06 (03) ◽  
pp. 199-208
Author(s):  
Sarita Rao ◽  
K. Roshan Rao ◽  
Achukatla Kumar

AbstractIn the current era, coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is being increasingly performed using total arterial revascularization or a hybrid procedure of stenting of non-LAD disease and minimal access left internal mammary artery (LIMA) to LAD grafts, in order to minimize the need for vein grafts. Still, we encounter saphenous vein graft (SVG) disease, and it might require PCI, which often presents with unique challenges. The current favored strategy is to attempt PCI of the native coronary, if feasible, especially in long degenerated SVG disease, as it has shown better short- and long-term outcome. PCI is preferred over repeat CABG for early recurrent symptoms after CABG in patent LIMA graft and amenable anatomy patients. Balloon predilatation is not recommended unless delivery of an EPD or stent is not possible. Distal protection should be considered the standard of care for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in most patients with older vein grafts, as periprocedural myocardial infarction and no reflow are the Achilles heel of SVG PCI. Intragraft vasodilators should be used liberally, even before balloon angioplasty/stenting. Avoid postdilatation, and usage of undersized but a longer stent length to reduce plaque extrusion through stent struts is preferred. Consider thrombectomy in lesions with a heavy thrombus burden. Keep activated clotting time on the higher side than in conventional PCI. Prolonged dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) based on the DAPT score is recommended. With all the precautions and care, we still need a fair wind in our favor to sail through the vein grafts disease.

2021 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Zivelonghi ◽  
Giovanni Maria Vescovo ◽  
Pierfrancesco Agostoni ◽  
Adriaan Wilgenhof ◽  
Yannick Willemen ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 187-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas Twidale ◽  
Charles W. Barth ◽  
Robert M. Kipperman ◽  
Mark H. Bowles ◽  
Joseph P. Galichia

1999 ◽  
Vol 83 (5) ◽  
pp. 681-686 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel R Le May ◽  
Marino Labinaz ◽  
Jean-François Marquis ◽  
Louise A Laramée ◽  
Edward R O’Brien ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (3) ◽  
pp. 518-525 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Wallgren ◽  
Susanne Nielsen ◽  
Emily Pan ◽  
Aldina Pivodic ◽  
Emma C Hansson ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES Our goal was to compare short- and midterm outcomes after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) using 2 different revascularization strategies. METHODS A total of 6895 patients were included who had CABG in Sweden from 2009 to 2015 using the left internal mammary artery to the left anterior descending artery and either a single sequential saphenous vein graft connecting the left and right coronary territories to the aorta (snake graft, n = 2122) or separate vein grafts to both territories (n = 4773). Data were obtained from the Swedish Web System for Enhancement of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease Evaluated According to Recommended Therapies (SWEDEHEART) and the Swedish Patient Registry. The groups were compared using adjusted logistic regression for short-term (30-day) and Cox regression and flexible parametric survival models for midterm outcomes. Primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), reangiography and new revascularization. The median follow-up time was 35 months. RESULTS At 30 days, the incidences of the composite end point [odds ratio (OR) 1.31, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.68; P = 0.03] and reangiography (OR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07–2.14; P = 0.02) were higher in the snake group. There was also a trend towards higher mortality (OR 1.47, 95% CI 0.97–2.22; P = 0.07). The event rates during the complete follow-up period were 6.5 (5.9–7.2) and 5.7 (5.3–6.1) per 100 person-years for the snake group and the separate vein group, respectively. At the midterm follow-up, no significant difference between the groups could be shown for the composite end point [hazard ratio (HR) 1.08, 95% CI 0.95–1.22; P = 0.24], mortality (HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.79–1.14; P = 0.56), MI (HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88–1.41; P = 0.39) or new revascularization (HR 1.19, 95% CI 0.94–1.50; P = 0.15), whereas reangiography remained more common in the snake group (HR 1.25, 95% CI 1.05–1.48; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Snake grafts were associated with a higher rate of early postoperative complications, possibly reflecting a more demanding surgical technique, whereas midterm outcomes were comparable. Based on these data, one strategy cannot be recommended over the other.


Author(s):  
Ninos Samano ◽  
Domingos Souza

After almost 30 years since the first harvesting of the saphenous vein graft with a pedicle of surrounding tissue (no-touch technique), there is no doubt that this method is superior to the conventional technique in which a denuded vein is harvested. In summary, the no-touch harvesting technique decreases risk of graft spasm and the requirement for manual dilatation, limiting endothelial cell loss and long-term damage. The preservation of the vasa vasorum allows retrograde blood flow from the graft lumen, thereby decreasing transmural ischaemic damage. This also preserves endothelial nitric oxide synthase, known to decrease intimal hyperplasia, atherosclerosis, and long-term graft failure. Furthermore, the perivascular tissue acts as a natural external stent reducing the neointimal and medial thickening of the vein graft and preventing it from kinking, which is especially vital for sequential grafts. Finally, target vessel size, quality, and degree of stenosis have little effect on the patency rates of no-touch saphenous vein grafts, in contrast to arterial grafts.


2021 ◽  
Vol 4 (7) ◽  
pp. 01-04
Author(s):  
Ehsan Khalilipur

Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) has been the first option for revascularization in multiple vessel coronary artery disease. One of the most major obstacles after CABGs is atherosclerotic changes of SVGand more than 50 percent ofSVGare occluded at 10 years and 25 percent show severe stenosis at angiographic follow-up. Whether native vessel percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on native vessel or saphenous vein graft intervention is of benefit in these patients is still a debate. In this case report we want to clarify a common clinical scenario in a patient with prior CABG seven years ago which a proper decision in the right time could save many futile efforts. The patient underwent 7 PCI on the diseased SVG on OM with frequent occlusion due to stent thrombosis and in-stent restenosis which finally native vessel antegrade CTO PCI alleviated the problem and patient followed up 2 months after the procedure without any chest pain in his ordinary activities.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document