Uncertainty and the Evaluation of Public Investment Decisions

Author(s):  
Kenneth J. Arrow ◽  
Robert C. Lind
2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 492-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
George C. Galster

Nonlinear and threshold relationships are commonly manifested in neighborhoods, both relating to effects of neighborhoods on residents and causes of neighborhood changes arising from individual mobility and housing investment decisions. These relationships are generated by amalgam of often reinforcing processes related to socialization, gaming, tolerance, contagion, and tolerance. The existence of nonlinear and threshold effects holds powerful implications for planners. Scarce public investment resources must be spatially concentrated, so that they exceed property owners’ reinvestment thresholds. Poverty deconcentration strategies must seek to replace neighborhoods exceeding 40 percent poverty rates with those that have low (less than 15 percent) poverty rates.


2020 ◽  
pp. 29-93
Author(s):  
Andrew K. Kamenju ◽  
Olweny

Countries with a high investment GDP ratio benefit from better, competitive products and services. Which increases capital stock for production, more employment, and income; in turn reducing social and income disparities. The Kenyan government envisaged a sustained economic growth of 10% by investing in priority sectors; to become an industrialized middle-income country by the year 2030; though un-achieved to date. To examine the nexus between internal investments and economic growth, the study used annual time-series observations from the years 1996 to 2017; where internal investments are from the government; private domestic; and public-private partnership; and exogenous variables were rates of real interest; social discount; commercial lending interest; and the country risk premium on lending for investment decisions. The inference used stationarity; cointegration; significance; causality; variance decomposition of forecast error; and impulse response function. Stationarity tests suited the ARDL model which also supports small size observations. Findings were; a significant and positive influence on economic growth from lags of real GDP, government, private domestic, except public-private partnership investments. Anticipation for growth lies with; significant pairwise causality (real GDP with public investment); significant block exogeneity (public investment); endogeneity (real GDP), and exogeneity (public investment) influence; and short-run private domestic investment recovery. Keywords: ARDL, Economic Growth, Public Investment, Private Domestic Investment, Public-Private Partnership Investment, Investment Decisions.


Public Choice ◽  
1971 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
David L. Shapiro

1970 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 35-46
Author(s):  
Sharad Sharma

Not available.Key words: Investment decisions; Scarcity of resources; Economy; NepalTribhuvan University Journal Vol XXI, No. 2, 1998 Page: 35-46 Uploaded date: 22 April, 2011


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document