Four-segment classification of proximal humeral fractures: Purpose and reliable use

2002 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 389-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles S. Neer
2016 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 455-462 ◽  
Author(s):  
Herbert Resch ◽  
Mark Tauber ◽  
Robert J. Neviaser ◽  
Andrew S. Neviaser ◽  
Addie Majed ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 367-368
Author(s):  
Christian Cuny ◽  
Cedric Baumann ◽  
Julien Mayer ◽  
Didier Guignand ◽  
M’barek Irrazi ◽  
...  

1996 ◽  
Vol 78 (9) ◽  
pp. 1371-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
JOSEPH BERNSTEIN ◽  
LOUIS M. ADLER ◽  
JOHN E. BLANK ◽  
ROBERT M. DALSEY ◽  
GERALD R. WILLIAMS ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 35-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Cuny ◽  
Cedric Baumann ◽  
Julien Mayer ◽  
Didier Guignand ◽  
M’barek Irrazi ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo Gotzen ◽  
Christian Bahrs ◽  
Ronald Leppek ◽  
Michael Schnabel

1997 ◽  
Vol 68 (3) ◽  
pp. 239-242 ◽  
Author(s):  
Göran O J Sjödén ◽  
Tomas Movin ◽  
Peter Güntner ◽  
Peter Aspelin ◽  
Leif Ahrengart ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis den Hartog ◽  
Jeroen de Haan ◽  
Niels W. Schep ◽  
Wim E. Tuinebreijer

The objective was to identify whether arthroplasty or conservative treatment is the best available treatment for three- and four-part proximal humeral fractures by analyzing the outcome measure of the Constant score. We conducted an electronic search. The systematic review included 33 studies encompassing 1096 patients with three- or four-part proximal humeral fractures that used the Constant score as outcome measure. The mean Constant score in the conservative group was 66.5 and in the arthroplasty group was 55.5. The difference could be attributed to selection bias, unreliable classification of the fractures and inter-observer differences in the assessment of the Constant score.


Author(s):  
Hannah Bougher ◽  
Petra Buttner ◽  
Jonathon Smith ◽  
Jennifer Banks ◽  
Hyun Su Na ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document