NORMAL FORMS OF FUNCTIONS IN NEIGHBOURHOODS OF DEGENERATE CRITICAL POINTS

1974 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 10-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vladimir I Arnol'd
Keyword(s):  
2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (16) ◽  
pp. 2030050
Author(s):  
Bing Zeng ◽  
Pei Yu

In recent publications [Llibre, 2014; Llibre & Makhlouf, 2020], time-averaging method was applied to studying periodic orbits bifurcating from zero-Hopf critical points of two Rössler systems. It was shown that the averaging method is successful for a certain type of zero-Hopf critical points, but fails for some type of such critical points. In this paper, we apply normal form theory to reinvestigate the bifurcation and show that the method of normal forms is applicable for all types of zero-Hopf bifurcations, revealing why the time-averaging method fails for some type of zero-Hopf bifurcation.


Paleobiology ◽  
1980 ◽  
Vol 6 (02) ◽  
pp. 146-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Oliver

The Mesozoic-Cenozoic coral Order Scleractinia has been suggested to have originated or evolved (1) by direct descent from the Paleozoic Order Rugosa or (2) by the development of a skeleton in members of one of the anemone groups that probably have existed throughout Phanerozoic time. In spite of much work on the subject, advocates of the direct descent hypothesis have failed to find convincing evidence of this relationship. Critical points are:(1) Rugosan septal insertion is serial; Scleractinian insertion is cyclic; no intermediate stages have been demonstrated. Apparent intermediates are Scleractinia having bilateral cyclic insertion or teratological Rugosa.(2) There is convincing evidence that the skeletons of many Rugosa were calcitic and none are known to be or to have been aragonitic. In contrast, the skeletons of all living Scleractinia are aragonitic and there is evidence that fossil Scleractinia were aragonitic also. The mineralogic difference is almost certainly due to intrinsic biologic factors.(3) No early Triassic corals of either group are known. This fact is not compelling (by itself) but is important in connection with points 1 and 2, because, given direct descent, both changes took place during this only stage in the history of the two groups in which there are no known corals.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document