scholarly journals The effects of HEROES on the achievement levels of beginning readers with individualized education programs

Author(s):  
Jerome V. D’Agostino ◽  
Emily Rodgers ◽  
Spyros Konstantopoulos
1978 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 207-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lee H. Andersen ◽  
Sandra L. Barner ◽  
Harry J. Larson

1994 ◽  
Vol 15 (5) ◽  
pp. 288-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
MICHAEL F. GIANGRECO ◽  
RUTH E. DENNIS ◽  
SUSAN W. EDELMAN ◽  
CHIGEE J. CLONINGER

THIS ARTICLE DESCRIBES CHARACTERISTICS OF INDIVIDUALIZED EDUCATION PROGRAMS (IEPS) OF 46 STUDENTS FROM NINE DIFFERENT STATES IN KINDERGARTEN THROUGH GRADE 12 WHO HAVE MULTIPLE DISABILITIES AND RECEIVE ALL OR PART OF THEIR EDUCATION IN GENERAL EDUCATION CLASSES. THROUGH CATEGORICAL CODING OF THE STUDENTS' IEP GOALS AND OBJECTIVES, SEVERAL THEMES WERE IDENTIFIED THAT HIGHLIGHT PROBLEMATIC CHARACTERISTICS OF IEPS. ALTERNATIVES ARE SUGGESTED THAT THE AUTHORS BELIEVE MAY MORE ADEQUATELY COMMUNICATE THE UNIQUE NEEDS OF INDIVIDUAL STUDENTS TO THEIR TEACHERS IN GENERAL EDUCATION CLASSES AND IMPROVE THE USEFULNESS OF IEPS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 54 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-39
Author(s):  
Sara E. N. Kangas

With many students learning English also identified with disabilities in public schools, collaborations across special education and English learner (EL) education are critical to promoting these students’ academic and linguistic development. Yet, many special education and EL teachers work independently of one another, focusing on their own specialized roles. In the process, students with disabilities who are learning English receive fragmented, inadequate special education and EL services. This article provides specific strategies—cocreating individualized education programs and instituting consultations—special education and EL teachers can implement to break out of their isolated roles and to build synergistic relationships that benefit the learning of students with disabilities who are learning English.


1980 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 31-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aileen W. Freasier ◽  
Sandra Watkins ◽  
Susie A. Payne ◽  
Katherine H. Kopp

Art Education ◽  
1984 ◽  
Vol 37 (6) ◽  
pp. 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lanny Morreau ◽  
Frances E. Anderson

1997 ◽  
Vol 63 (3) ◽  
pp. 357-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meg Grigal ◽  
David W. Test ◽  
John Beattie ◽  
Wendy M. Wood

This study evaluated the transition component of the individualized education programs (IEPs) of 94 high school students between the ages of 18 and 21—students with learning disabilities, mild mental retardation, moderate mental retardation, and emotional/behavioral disorders. The study examined the format of the transition component document, compliance with the mandates of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and reflections of best practices, as well as the differences in these aspects of IEP transition components among disability groups. Results indicated that although the majority of the transition components complied with IDEA's mandate, they lacked many of the essential elements reflective of best practices in transition.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document