Custom ocular prosthesis-related concerns: patient feedback survey-based report vis-à-vis objective clinical grading scales

Orbit ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Tarjani Vivek Dave ◽  
Arpita Nayak ◽  
Mansha Palo ◽  
Yashwanth Goud ◽  
Dharani Tripuraneni ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 93 (11) ◽  
pp. 1426-1430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarjani V. Dave ◽  
Sathish Kumar ◽  
Jaya Vasanthalin ◽  
Swathi Kaliki ◽  
Mohammad Javed Ali ◽  
...  

1974 ◽  
Vol 32 (4) ◽  
pp. 439-442 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorsey J. Moore ◽  
John S. Ostrowski ◽  
Lawrence M. King

2013 ◽  
Vol 3 ◽  
pp. 42-45
Author(s):  
Sandeep Chiramana ◽  
Gopinadh Anne ◽  
Kavya Ravuri ◽  
Phani Praneetha Boppana ◽  
Sampath Kumar ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 230-231
Author(s):  
Brian Y. Hwang ◽  
Geoffrey Appelboom ◽  
Christopher P. Kellner ◽  
E. Sander Connolly

1983 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 795-798 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph R. Cain ◽  
Henry LaFuente ◽  
Robert G. Small

1997 ◽  
Vol 18 (7) ◽  
pp. 443-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harold B. Kitaoka ◽  
Gary L. Patzer

To evaluate grading methods used to report clinical results, we reviewed 1,607 articles related to the foot and ankle published in six orthopaedic journals from 1980 through July 1993. Many clinical studies use criteria such as patient satisfaction to grade results. A numeric score or grade was used in 346 articles: 238 used a grade only, 90 used a numeric score and grade, and 18 used a numeric score only. The numeric score or grade was usually, but not always, reported with details of the individual clinical factors that composed the score or grade. Twenty-three articles used a score before and after treatment. Statistics were used in 62 articles, and in 6 of those the statistics were used to compare clinical condition before and after treatment. This study demonstrated the array of grading methods used in selected orthopaedic journals and indicated the need for standardized grading techniques to allow for more meaningful interpretation of the orthopaedic literature.


2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 78 ◽  
Author(s):  
Prachi Thakkar ◽  
Rajesh Sethuraman ◽  
JR Patel ◽  
Narendra Nirmal

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mayank Singh ◽  
Vinit Shah ◽  
Lakshya Yadav ◽  
Smriti Kharbanda

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 82 ◽  
Author(s):  
AnishVarkey John ◽  
S Anilkumar ◽  
C Rajesh ◽  
SandhyaM Raghavan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document