Does the lack of hands-on experience in a remotely delivered laboratory course affect student learning?

2006 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 747-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tarek Abdel-Salam ◽  
Paul J. Kauffman ◽  
Gary Crossman
2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Carmichael ◽  
Jacquelyn J. Chini ◽  
N. Sanjay Rebello ◽  
Sadhana Puntambekar ◽  
Chandralekha Singh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 146-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
John D. Griffin

The primary motivation for integrating any form of education technology into a particular course or curriculum should always be to enhance student learning. However, it can be difficult to determine which technologies will be the most appropriate and effective teaching tools. Through the alignment of technology-enhanced learning experiences with a clear set of learning objectives, teaching becomes more efficient and effective and learning is truly enhanced. In this article, I describe how I have made extensive use of technology in two neuroscience courses that differ in structure and content. Course websites function as resource centers and provide a forum for student interaction. PowerPoint presentations enhance formal lectures and provide an organized outline of presented material. Some lectures are also supplemented with interactive CD-ROMs, used in the presentation of difficult physiological concepts. In addition, a computer-based physiological recording system is used in laboratory sessions, improving the hands-on experience of group learning while reinforcing the concepts of the research method. Although technology can provide powerful teaching tools, the enhancement of the learning environment is still dependent on the instructor. It is the skill and enthusiasm of the instructor that determines whether technology will be used effectively.


1990 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 161-163 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.C. Compton ◽  
R.A. York
Keyword(s):  

2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 1963-1971 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor Kuzle ◽  
Juraj Havelka ◽  
Hrvoje Pandzic ◽  
Tomislav Capuder

1981 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 243-244
Author(s):  
Richard Halstead-Nussloch

A project, aiming to improve the undergraduate laboratory course in human factors, is ongoing at Stevens. It is funded by the National Science Foundation and Stevens. Six instructional modules are either developed or under development. The modules use computers to first give students a direct hands-on experience of critical concepts and phenomena, and then have them infer design criteria from simulated data. The computer tools appear to qualitatively change the course from one of passive absorbtion of human factors concepts and principles to active development of these concepts, principles and design criteria.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document