Toward Understanding Economic and Ecological Outcomes of Selection Silviculture of Northern Hardwoods in New England

2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 319-342
Author(s):  
Katherine Sinacore ◽  
Theodore Howard
2008 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 103-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Leak ◽  
Jeffrey H. Gove

Abstract Twenty-five-year results from a study of four stand density levels and three percentages of sawtimber in a beech-red maple-birch-hemlock stand in New Hampshire showed that moderate stand densities of 60- to 80-ft2/ac with 25- to 30-ft2 of sawtimber produced the best growth responses. Ingrowth was dominated by beech, red maple, and hemlock. Treatments with low initial numbers of poletimber stems had well-developed J-shaped or slightly sigmoid diameter distributions after 25 years. Results apply to the first entries into northern hardwood stands ofmoderate vigor and quality.


1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl H. Tubbs ◽  
Richard M. DeGraaf ◽  
Mariko Yamasaki ◽  
William M. Healy

2007 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 227-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
William B. Leak

Abstract Four 5-ac demonstration harvests were initiated in 1951 on the Bartlett Experimental Forest, New Hampshire: light selection, moderate selection, diameter limit, and liquidation. In 1952 and 1959, regeneration surveys were conducted that measured several different attributes of the seedlings and saplings in the cutover stands. In 2005, the stands were remeasured to determine the relationships of the various regeneration measures to current species composition of the pole-timber portion of the stands. Although predictions were somewhat variable and imperfect, the best measures for shade-tolerant species were those that took account of the sapling layer, and measures based on the dominant stem per small plot were best for less-tolerant species. Combining both attributes, these results suggest that the best approach would be a small-plot survey (milacre or slightly larger) that simply records the dominant stem per plot including stems up through the sapling size classes (less than 4.5-in. dbh). This could be taken before harvest, to predict the effects of a light partial cut, or 5–7 years after harvest, to predict future species composition after any harvest intensity.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document