scholarly journals Integrating computational methods to predict mutagenicity of aromatic azo compounds

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 239-257 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico Gadaleta ◽  
Nicola Porta ◽  
Eleni Vrontaki ◽  
Serena Manganelli ◽  
Alberto Manganaro ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Charles O. Oseghale ◽  
Dele Peter Fapojuwo ◽  
Oyekunle Azeez Alimi ◽  
Christianah Aarinola Akinnawo ◽  
Batsile M. Mogudi ◽  
...  

Science ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 322 (5908) ◽  
pp. 1661-1664 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Grirrane ◽  
A. Corma ◽  
H. Garcia

1975 ◽  
Vol 6 (51) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
BRYCE D. WILKINSON ◽  
DUNCAN A. R. HAPPER

1980 ◽  
Vol 35 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eberhard Hohaus ◽  
Wolfgang Riepe ◽  
Klaus Wessendorf

Differing fragmentation of boron chelates of aromatic azo compounds confirms the structural formulae 1a-7c, presented in [2].More significant differences are caused by the substituent of the boron R (F instead of C6H5).Although certain rules can be deduced by the substitution of F for CeHs with regard to the change in intensity of the ions M+, M+-R (and others), in some cases the stable aromatic azo system causes a significant change in the fragmentation as compared with that of azomethine chelates. The chelates 7 eliminate “RH” and show no molecular ion. Apparently a second chelate ring is closed before further fragmentation can start. Fragmentation of 7 a and b is analogous to 5.


2012 ◽  
Vol 124 (31) ◽  
pp. 7924-7928 ◽  
Author(s):  
Youhei Takeda ◽  
Sota Okumura ◽  
Satoshi Minakata

1977 ◽  
Vol 8 (41) ◽  
pp. no-no
Author(s):  
J.-L. GARDETTE ◽  
G. GUYOT ◽  
R. ARNAUD ◽  
J. LEMAIRE

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document