On the modal interpretation of the connective of realisation

Author(s):  
A. M. Karczewska
Keyword(s):  
1996 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 206-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Davenport
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 39 (9) ◽  
pp. 1023-1045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Sebastian Ardenghi ◽  
Mario Castagnino ◽  
Olimpia Lombardi

2021 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 82
Author(s):  
Anna Melnikova

Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian (BCS) has a productive ‘involuntary state construction (ISC) with a modal interpretation. There is an ongoing debate concerning the syntactic complexity of this construction. According to one account – the “mono-clausal analysis”, ISCs have only one (overt) lexical verb, and the modal interpretation stems from the imperfective operator (Rivero and Milojević-Sheppard 2003,Rivero 2009, Tsedryk 2016). There is also a “bi-clausal account” which argues in favor of a covert matrix verb of involuntary disposition feel-like, which takes a clausal ModP complement, giving the modal interpretation (Marušič & Žaucer 2005 [henceforth M&Ž]). In this paper, I provide additional evidence in favor of the bi-clausal approach and in so doing, account for a previously unresolved aspectual restriction on the construction, namely that it is ungrammatical with a perfective lexical verb. The main claim is that the unavailability of perfective in the ISC is due to selectional properties of covert feel-like, which results in the violation of requirements on perfective.


2006 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 251-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rani Nelken ◽  
Chung-Chieh Shan
Keyword(s):  

2006 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 161-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonny Butler

This paper offers a view of clause structure based on semantic interpretability, focusing on the structure and interpretation of temporal (tense, aspect) and modal elements. It proposes that modality has a unitary lexical semantics along the lines of Krater (1977 et seq), with different interpretations of modals deriving from the interaction of that semantics with the interpretation of the temporal elements in the structural context the modals are found. Different positions for modal interpretation are proposed, corresponding the the edges of phases (Chomsky 2001). Evidence for this view is put forward from various languages. The clause structure so derived is akin to the universal clausal hierarchy proposed by Cinque (1999), lending support to the notion that something like this hierarchy does indeed hold in natural language, though the justification for it is very different.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document