Harvest stage and storage effects on postharvest quality and vase life of Queen Anne’s lace (Daucus carota L.)

Author(s):  
Vasiliki Kargakou ◽  
Anastasios I. Darras
1983 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 175-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. C. HOLE ◽  
A. BARNES ◽  
T. H. THOMAS ◽  
P. A. SCOTT ◽  
W. E. F. RANKIN

1983 ◽  
Vol 51 (2) ◽  
pp. 189-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. H. THOMAS ◽  
A. BARNES ◽  
W. E. F. RANKIN ◽  
C. C. HOLE

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 463-469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Iftikhar Ahmad ◽  
John M. Dole ◽  
Atyab Amjad ◽  
Sagheer Ahmad

Effects of wet and dry storage methods were compared to improve postharvest performance of specialty cut flower species. While increasing duration of storage reduced vase life, vase life declined less with dry storage for marigold (Tagetes erecta) and rose (Rosa hybrida), but not for zinnia (Zinnia elegans) or lisianthus (Eustoma grandiflorum) over wet storage. Marigold stems had 1.9, 4.6, and 1.5 days longer vase life after 1, 2, or 3 weeks in dry storage, respectively, as compared with storage in water. Zinnia stems did not tolerate either wet or dry storage, while lisianthus stems had a longer vase life when stored in water as compared with dry storage. For rose, dry storage for 2 weeks increased vase life compared with wet storage. Dry stored marigold and lisianthus stems had higher water uptake after being placed in the vase as compared with the stems stored in water, while zinnia and rose had less uptake. Storage method had no effect on leaf relative water content (LRWC) in lisianthus, marigold, and zinnia; however, LRWC decreased with increased storage duration. This necessitates evaluation of storage method and duration effects for each species and cultivar to ensure extended storage life and improve postharvest quality.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document