Telecollaboration 2.0: language, literacies and intercultural learning in the 21st century

2011 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 285-288
Author(s):  
Victoria Antoniadou
Author(s):  
Emma Trentman ◽  
Wenhao Diao

Abstract The 21st century has seen an emphasis in US media and policy documents on increasing the numbers of US students studying abroad and also the amount of US students studying ‘critical’ languages. This paper examines the intersection of these discourses, or the experiences of critical language learners abroad. We analyze this intersection by using critical discourse analysis to examine US media and policy documents and data from students studying Arabic in Egypt and Mandarin in China. This analysis reveals considerable discrepancies between rhetoric and experience in terms of language and intercultural learning. We argue that a critical examination of current discourses of study abroad (SA) reveals that they in fact recreate the colonial map, mask global inequalities, and create a new global elite. We conclude that language and intercultural learning abroad will remain a source of tension until SA students and programs critically engage with these discourses.


2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 43-56
Author(s):  
M. Elena Gómez-Parra

CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) —endorsed by the European Commission since 1996— constitutes the official approach to bilingual education in Spain. Intercultural learning (IL) is one of the four defining Cs in CLIL, though the literature has consistently described it as the weakest implementation area. This paper analyses the opinions of 76 Spanish secondary education students about IL through their bilingual curriculum. Their viewpoints clearly suggest that IL comes from two main sources: native assistants; and exchange programmes. These data were contrasted with the views of school principals and bilingual coordinators, who declared that both of these valuable ‘resources’ for IL are scarce due to administrative difficulties and lack of budget. Our conclusions reveal how improving these areas can lead not only to improved scores but also to a better implementation of the intercultural axis in CLIL, if the goal consists in educating 21st century citizens.


ASHA Leader ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 12 (14) ◽  
pp. 24-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gloria D. Kellum ◽  
Sue T. Hale

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document