scholarly journals Settling a number of questions about hyper-Archimedean lattice-ordered groups

1990 ◽  
Vol 109 (2) ◽  
pp. 291-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Conrad ◽  
Jorge Martinez
2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 165-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. N. Ball ◽  
A. W. Hager ◽  
D. G. Johnson ◽  
A. Kizanis

1971 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger D. Bleier

We show that each archimedean lattice-ordered group is contained in a unique (up to isomorphism) minimal archimedean vector lattice. This improves a result of Paul F. Conrad appearing previously in this Bulletin. Moreover, we show that this relationship between archimedean lattice-ordered groups and archimedean vector lattices is functorial.


2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Štefan Černák ◽  
Judita Lihová

AbstractThe notion of a relatively uniform convergence (ru-convergence) has been used first in vector lattices and then in Archimedean lattice ordered groups.Let G be an Archimedean lattice ordered group. In the present paper, a relative uniform completion (ru-completion) $$ G_{\omega _1 } $$ of G is dealt with. It is known that $$ G_{\omega _1 } $$ exists and it is uniquely determined up to isomorphisms over G. The ru-completion of a finite direct product and of a completely subdirect product are established. We examine also whether certain properties of G remain valid in $$ G_{\omega _1 } $$. Finally, we are interested in the existence of a greatest convex l-subgroup of G, which is complete with respect to ru-convergence.


2010 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ján Jakubík ◽  
Štefan Černák

AbstractFor an archimedean lattice ordered group G let G d and G∧ be the divisible hull or the Dedekind completion of G, respectively. Put G d∧ = X. Then X is a vector lattice. In the present paper we deal with the relations between the relatively uniform convergence on X and the relatively uniform convergence on G. We also consider the relations between the o-convergence and the relatively uniform convergence on G. For any nonempty class τ of lattice ordered groups we introduce the notion of τ-radical class; we apply this notion by investigating relative uniform convergences.


1998 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Hager ◽  
J. Martinez

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Hager ◽  
Jorge Martínez

AbstractHölder categories are invented to provide an axiomatic foundation for the study of categories of archimedean lattice-ordered algebraic structures. The basis of such a study is Hölder’s Theorem (1908), stating that the archimedean totally ordered groups are precisely the subgroups of the additive real numbers ℝ with the usual addition and ordering, which remains the single most consequential result in the studies of lattice-ordered algebraic systems since Birkhoff and Fuchs to the present.This study originated with interest in W*, the category of all archimedean lattice-ordered groups with a designated strong order unit, and the ℓ-homomorphisms which preserve those units, and, more precisely, with interest in the epireflections on W*. In the course of this study, certain abstract notions jumped to the forefront. Two of these, in particular, seem to have been mostly overlooked; some notion of simplicity appears to be essential to any kind of categorical study of W*, as are the quasi-initial objects in a category. Once these two notions have been brought into the conversation, a Hölder category may then be defined as one which is complete, well powered, and in which(a) the initial object I is simple, and(b) there is a simple quasi-initial coseparator R.In this framework it is shown that the epireflective hull of R is the least monoreflective class. And, when I = R — that is, the initial element is simple and a coseparator — a theorem of Bezhanishvili, Morandi, and Olberding, for bounded archimedean f-algebras with identity, can be be generalized, as follows: for any Hölder category subject to the stipulation that the initial object is a simple coseparator, every uniformly nontrivial reflection — meaning that the reflection of each non-terminal object is non-terminal — is a monoreflection.Also shown here is the fact that the atoms in the class of epireflective classes are the epireflective hulls of the simple quasi-initial objects. From this observation one easily deduces a converse to the result of Bezhanishvili, Morandi, and Olberding: if in a Hölder category every epireflection is a monoreflection, then the initial object is a coseparator.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document