Hölder categories

2014 ◽  
Vol 64 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony Hager ◽  
Jorge Martínez

AbstractHölder categories are invented to provide an axiomatic foundation for the study of categories of archimedean lattice-ordered algebraic structures. The basis of such a study is Hölder’s Theorem (1908), stating that the archimedean totally ordered groups are precisely the subgroups of the additive real numbers ℝ with the usual addition and ordering, which remains the single most consequential result in the studies of lattice-ordered algebraic systems since Birkhoff and Fuchs to the present.This study originated with interest in W*, the category of all archimedean lattice-ordered groups with a designated strong order unit, and the ℓ-homomorphisms which preserve those units, and, more precisely, with interest in the epireflections on W*. In the course of this study, certain abstract notions jumped to the forefront. Two of these, in particular, seem to have been mostly overlooked; some notion of simplicity appears to be essential to any kind of categorical study of W*, as are the quasi-initial objects in a category. Once these two notions have been brought into the conversation, a Hölder category may then be defined as one which is complete, well powered, and in which(a) the initial object I is simple, and(b) there is a simple quasi-initial coseparator R.In this framework it is shown that the epireflective hull of R is the least monoreflective class. And, when I = R — that is, the initial element is simple and a coseparator — a theorem of Bezhanishvili, Morandi, and Olberding, for bounded archimedean f-algebras with identity, can be be generalized, as follows: for any Hölder category subject to the stipulation that the initial object is a simple coseparator, every uniformly nontrivial reflection — meaning that the reflection of each non-terminal object is non-terminal — is a monoreflection.Also shown here is the fact that the atoms in the class of epireflective classes are the epireflective hulls of the simple quasi-initial objects. From this observation one easily deduces a converse to the result of Bezhanishvili, Morandi, and Olberding: if in a Hölder category every epireflection is a monoreflection, then the initial object is a coseparator.

Author(s):  
Anthony W. Hager ◽  
Ann Kizanis

AbstractAs a consequence of general principles, we add to the array of ‘hulls’ in the category Arch (of archimedean ℓ-groups with ℓ-homomorphisms) and in its non-full subcategory W (whose objects have distinguished weak order unit, whose morphisms preserve the unit). The following discussion refers to either Arch or W. Let α be an infinite cardinal number or ∞, let Homα; denote the class of α-complete homomorphisms, and let R be a full epireflective subcategory with reflections denoted rG: G → rG. Then for each G, there is rαG ∈ Homα (G, R) such that for each ϕ ∈ Homα (G, R), there is unique with . Moreover if every rG is an essential embedding, then, for every α and every G, rαG = rG, and every Homα. If and R consists of all epicomplete objects, then every Homw1. For α = ∞, and for any R, every Hom∞.


2011 ◽  
Vol 61 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jorge Martínez

AbstractThis paper introduces the notion of a functorial torsion class (FTC): in a concrete category $\mathfrak{C}$ which has image factorization, one considers monocoreflective subcategories which are closed under formation of subobjects.Here the interest is in FTCs in the category of abelian lattice-ordered groups with designated strong order unit. The FTCs $\mathfrak{T}$ consisting of archimedean latticeordered groups are characterized: for each subgroup A of the rationals with the identity 1, either $\mathfrak{T} = \mathfrak{S}\left( A \right)$, the class of all lattice-ordered groups of functions on a set X which have finite range in A, or $$\mathfrak{T} = \mathbb{T}\left( A \right)$$, the class of all subgroups of A with 1.As for FTCs possessing non-archimedean groups, it is shown that if $\mathfrak{T}$ is an FTC containing a subgroup A of the reals with 1, of rank two or greater, then $\mathfrak{T}$ contains all ℓ-groups of the form $A\vec \times G$, for all abelian lattice-ordered groups G. Finally, the least FTC that contains a non-archimedean group is the class of all $\mathbb{Z}\vec \times G$, for all abelian lattice-ordered groups G.


2009 ◽  
Vol 62 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 165-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. N. Ball ◽  
A. W. Hager ◽  
D. G. Johnson ◽  
A. Kizanis

1971 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roger D. Bleier

We show that each archimedean lattice-ordered group is contained in a unique (up to isomorphism) minimal archimedean vector lattice. This improves a result of Paul F. Conrad appearing previously in this Bulletin. Moreover, we show that this relationship between archimedean lattice-ordered groups and archimedean vector lattices is functorial.


Author(s):  
E. C. Weinberg

AbstractBy using the concept of tame embeddings of chains, a characterization is given of the subobjects of the lattice-ordered groups of order-automorphisms of the chains of rational and real numbers.


2009 ◽  
Vol 59 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Štefan Černák ◽  
Judita Lihová

AbstractThe notion of a relatively uniform convergence (ru-convergence) has been used first in vector lattices and then in Archimedean lattice ordered groups.Let G be an Archimedean lattice ordered group. In the present paper, a relative uniform completion (ru-completion) $$ G_{\omega _1 } $$ of G is dealt with. It is known that $$ G_{\omega _1 } $$ exists and it is uniquely determined up to isomorphisms over G. The ru-completion of a finite direct product and of a completely subdirect product are established. We examine also whether certain properties of G remain valid in $$ G_{\omega _1 } $$. Finally, we are interested in the existence of a greatest convex l-subgroup of G, which is complete with respect to ru-convergence.


2010 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ján Jakubík ◽  
Štefan Černák

AbstractFor an archimedean lattice ordered group G let G d and G∧ be the divisible hull or the Dedekind completion of G, respectively. Put G d∧ = X. Then X is a vector lattice. In the present paper we deal with the relations between the relatively uniform convergence on X and the relatively uniform convergence on G. We also consider the relations between the o-convergence and the relatively uniform convergence on G. For any nonempty class τ of lattice ordered groups we introduce the notion of τ-radical class; we apply this notion by investigating relative uniform convergences.


1998 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. W. Hager ◽  
J. Martinez

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document