scholarly journals IMPACT OF SELECTIVE AND BROAD-SPECTRUM INSECTICIDES ON SOUTHERN ARMYWORM AND BEET ARMYWORM ON STAKED TOMATO, 1998

2000 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Stansly ◽  
J.M. Conner
1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 191-191
Author(s):  
P. A. Stansly ◽  
J. M. Conner

Abstract Greenhouse raised tomato seedings “Florasette” were planted 8 Sep. 1994, 18 inches within the row on six subirrigated beds, 240 ft long, 32 ft wide on 6 ft centers. Beds had been fumigated with methyl bromide + chloropicrin 67/33 at a rate of 2201b/acre and mulched with whiteside polyethylene. Each of 4, 125 ft blocks was divided into 4, 3-row plots 25 ft long plus 2.5 ft walkways. Plants were sprayed weekly with an alternating combination of Maneb 80 WP at 1 lb/acre plus Kocide 101 at 31b/acre and Bravo 720 at 1.5 pt/acre for disease control. Plants were inoculated on 5 Oct with beet armyworm and on 19 Oct with SAW on 19 Oct to supplement natural populations by applying 2-3 neonates (2-3 per plant) in Grito-O-Cobs (20-40 mesh) to foliage with a “bazooka” gun. Treatments and spray schedules are given in Tables 1 and 2. Spray was delivered weekly for 7 weeks starting in 21 Oct using a high clearance sprayer equipped with yellow hollow cone Albuz nozzles at 200 psi pump pressure. Configuration for the first 4 applications was 9 nozzles per row, one overhead and four each side calibrated to deliver 89 GPA. An additional nozzle per side drop was added for the last 3 applications to deliver 110 GPA. Larval populations were evaluated weekly from 21 Oct to 29 Nov on 6 ft of row from the center of each 3-row plot in two-plant (between-stake) units. Larvae were counted in 3 size categories: small, medium and large but only medium and large are reported. Fruit of marketable size was harvested on 21 Nov & 02 Dec and graded on a commercial table with weights and numbers recorded.


1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P.A. Stansly ◽  
J.M. Conner ◽  
M.A. Pomerinke

2003 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Stansly ◽  
J. M. Conner ◽  
J. R. Brushwein

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Stansly ◽  
J. M. Conner ◽  
D.R. Peach

1999 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Stansly ◽  
J. M. Conner ◽  
M. A. Pomerinke

2001 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. A. Stansly ◽  
J. M. Conner ◽  
D. R. Peach

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 56-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy L. Donaldson ◽  
Karen Krejcha ◽  
Andy McMillin

The autism community represents a broad spectrum of individuals, including those experiencing autism, their parents and/or caregivers, friends and family members, professionals serving these individuals, and other allies and advocates. Beliefs, experiences, and values across the community can be quite varied. As such, it is important for the professionals serving the autism community to be well-informed about current discussions occurring within the community related to neurodiversity, a strengths-based approach to partnering with autism community, identity-first language, and concepts such as presumed competence. Given the frequency with which speech-language pathologists (SLPs) serve the autism community, the aim of this article is to introduce and briefly discuss these topics.


1981 ◽  
Vol 117 (7) ◽  
pp. 418-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. J. Voorhees
Keyword(s):  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document