scholarly journals A randomized surgical trial of mitral valve repair with leaflet resection versus leaflet preservation on functional mitral stenosis – primary results of the CAMRA CardioLink-2 trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
V Chan ◽  
C.D Mazer ◽  
T Mesana ◽  
B.E De Varennes ◽  
A.J Gregory ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The gold standard treatment for mitral valve regurgitation due to prolapse involves surgery with annuloplasty and either leaflet resection or leaflet preservation, with placement of artificial neochordae. It has been suggested that leaflet resection may be prone to functional mitral stenosis, whereby a patient may have a higher mitral gradient at peak exercise compared to a leaflet preservation strategy. Although both techniques are widely used, there has been no prospective randomized study conducted to compare these two techniques, particularly in regard to functional mitral stenosis. Methods A total of 104 patients with posterior leaflet prolapse were randomized to undergo mitral repair with either leaflet resection (N=54) or leaflet preservation (N=50) at 7 specialized Canadian cardiac centers. Patient age, proportion of female patients, and mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score was 63.9±10.4 years, 19%, and 1.4% for those who underwent leaflet resection, and 66.3±10.8 years, 16%, and 1.9% for those who underwent leaflet preservation, respectively. The primary endpoint was the mean trans-mitral repair gradient at peak exercise 12-months after repair. Results Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. At 12-months, the mean trans-mitral repair gradient at peak exercise in patients who underwent leaflet resection and preservation was 9.1±5.2 and 8.3±3.3 mmHg (P=0.4), respectively. The two groups had similar mean mitral valve gradient at rest (3.2±1.9 mmHg following resection and 3.1±1.1 mmHg following leaflet preservation, P=0.7). There was no between-group difference for the 6-minute walk distance (451±147 m and 481±95 m for the resection and preservation groups, respectively, P=0.3). Conclusion We report the first prospective surgical randomized trial to evaluate commonly used mitral valve repair strategies for posterior leaflet prolapse. Leaflet resection and leaflet preservation both yield acceptable results with no difference in postoperative valve gradient and functional status 12-months after surgical mitral valve repair. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada

2015 ◽  
pp. 77-82
Author(s):  
Ba Minh Du Le ◽  
Anh Vu Nguyen ◽  
Duc Phu Bui

Background and aim of the study: Mitral repair is now as the treatement of choice in patients suffering mitral regurgitation due to mitral valve prolapse or flail. However, mitral valve repair demands the mitral valve morphology being feasible for repair. The study aims at evaluating transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiographic features in consecutive patients with mitral valve prolapse or flail undergoing surgical repair at Hue Central Hospital. The correlation between preoperative and intraoperative echocardiographic features and surgical findings in these patients. These echocardiographic data may predict the surgical outcome. Methods: From December 2010 to January 2013, 73 patients (37 men, 36 women; average age 37.5) were recruited into the study. All patients had degenerative mitral valve disease causing important regurgitation and underwent systematic preoperative transthoracic echocardiography, preoperative and intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography for delineation of six segments (scallops) of anterior and posterior leaflets. Results: Among 73 patients, 64 patients were in fibroelastic deficiency (87.7%) and 9 patients suffered Barlow disease (12.3%). Mitral valve repair was performed in 52 patients (71.2%) and mitral replacement was performed in 21 patients (28.8%). All 52 mitral valve repair (81.3%) and 12 mitral valve replacement (18.7%) was performed in fibroelastic deficiency patients. All 9 Barlow patients must undergo mitral valve replacement (100%). A prolapse or flail of mitral valve in 73 patients was documented by transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and confirmed on surgical inspection. Accuracy of transthoracic echocardiography was (89.0%) and accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography was (91.8%) in identifying mitral valve segments prolapse or flail. Success rate of mitral valve repair was (98.0%) in prolapse of 1 or 2 segments, but was low (36.0%) in prolapse > 3 segments. Success rate of mitral valve repair was (96.6%) in prolapse of posterior leaflet, but was (63.6%) in prolapse anterior leaflet or bileaflet. Conclusion: - Mitral valve repair was favorable in fibroelastic deficiency patients, but difficult in Barlow patients. - Accuracy of transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography was high in identifying mitral valve segments prolapse or flail. - Success rate of mitral valve repair was high in prolapse of 1 or 2 segments. - Success rate of mitral valve repair was high in in prolapse of posterior leaflet. Key words: Mitral repair, echocardiography, degenerative, Barlow, fibroelastic deficiency, prolapse, flail


2006 ◽  
Vol 131 (2) ◽  
pp. 364-370 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michele De Bonis ◽  
Roberto Lorusso ◽  
Elisabetta Lapenna ◽  
Samer Kassem ◽  
Giuseppe De Cicco ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 (7) ◽  
pp. 413-415
Author(s):  
Tohru Asai

Degenerative mitral regurgitation due to posterior leaflet prolapse is often associated with tissue redundancy in the leaflet height and free margin of the prolapsing segment. The butterfly technique has been introduced for focal resection to precisely control the leaflet height without annular plication. This technique is indicated for a high prolapsing leaflet, greater than 20 mm. With intraoperative measurement of leaflet heights and ink dot marking as a depth indicator, the butterfly technique can be safely performed in most high posterior leaflet prolapse cases, without increasing the risk of systolic anterior motion.


2019 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ayse Cetinkaya ◽  
Stephanie Bär ◽  
Stefan Hein ◽  
Karin Bramlage ◽  
Peter Bramlage ◽  
...  

ASVIDE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 178-178
Author(s):  
Jules R. Olsthoorn ◽  
Samuel Heuts ◽  
Jean Daemen ◽  
Jos Maessen ◽  
Peyman Sardari Nia

ASVIDE ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 ◽  
pp. 179-179
Author(s):  
Jules R. Olsthoorn ◽  
Samuel Heuts ◽  
Jean Daemen ◽  
Jos Maessen ◽  
Peyman Sardari Nia

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document