scholarly journals A systematic review of outcomes related to hybrid coronary revascularization in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stent era

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 4627-4627
Author(s):  
R. E. Harskamp ◽  
J. M. Brennan ◽  
J. G. Gaca ◽  
M. E. Halkos ◽  
E. D. Peterson ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 96 (6) ◽  
pp. 2268-2277 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf E. Harskamp ◽  
Zhe Zheng ◽  
John H. Alexander ◽  
Judson B. Williams ◽  
Ying Xian ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 199-205
Author(s):  
Cai-xia Song ◽  
Chao Zhou ◽  
Wenbo Hou ◽  
Yuxia Yin ◽  
Shoutao Lu ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Nenna ◽  
Francesco Nappi ◽  
Cristiano Spadaccio ◽  
Salvatore Matteo Greco ◽  
Michele Pilato ◽  
...  

Aim: Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) for multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) integrates coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous intervention in a planned revascularization strategy. This systematic review summarizes the state of this art of this technique. Methods: Major databases searched until October 2021. Results: The available literature on HCR includes three randomized trials, ten meta-analysis and 27 retrospective studies. The greatest benefits are observed in patients with low-to-intermediate risk and less complex coronary anatomy; highly complex disease and the presence of risk factors favored conventional CABG in terms of adverse events and survival. Conclusion: HCR is an interesting approach for multivessel CAD but should not be considered a ‘one-size-fits-all’ procedure. Further studies will specify the subset of patients likely to benefit most from this hybrid approach.


2016 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 454-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dasdo Antonius Sinaga ◽  
Hee Hwa Ho ◽  
Timothy James Watson ◽  
Alyssa Sim ◽  
Thuzar Tint Nyein ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document