scholarly journals eReply. Re: Addition of the frozen elephant trunk to the ascending aorta and aortic arch replacement in case of Stanford type A aortic dissection occurring in the presence of Kommerell's diverticulum

2016 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 697.2-697
Author(s):  
Tadashi Kitamura ◽  
Yuki Tanaka ◽  
Tetsuya Horai ◽  
Kagami Miyaji
2020 ◽  
Vol 31 (2) ◽  
pp. 254-262
Author(s):  
Yunxing Xue ◽  
Jun Pan ◽  
Hailong Cao ◽  
Fudong Fan ◽  
Xuan Luo ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes and follow-up results among 5 main aortic arch surgery methods for type A aortic dissection in a single centre. METHODS From 2002 to 2018, 958 type A aortic dissection patients who received surgical repair were divided into 5 groups according to the arch surgery method: hemiarch replacement (n = 206), island arch replacement (n = 54), total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk (n = 425), triple-branched stent (n = 39) and fenestrated stent (n = 234). The indications for the different arch methods were related to the patient’s preoperative status, the location and extent of the dissection and the surgical ability of the surgeons. A comparative study was performed to identify the differences in the perioperative data, and the Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess the long-term survival and reintervention rates. Thirty matched surviving patients that were included in each group completed Computed tomography angiography to determine long-term reshaping effect. RESULTS The 30-day mortality rate was 15.8%, and there was no difference among the 5 groups (P = 0.848). The follow-up survival rates were similar among the 5 groups (P = 0.130), and the same was true for patients without reintervention (P = 0.471). In the propensity matching study, patients with stents (frozen elephant trunk, triple-branched stent, fenestrated stent) had a slower aortic dilation rate and a higher ratio of thrombosis in the false lumen at the descending aortic and abdominal aortic levels than patients without stents. CONCLUSIONS No standard method is available for arch surgery, and indications and long-term effects should be identified with clinical data. In our experiences, simpler surgical procedures could reduce mortality in critically ill patients and stents in the distal aorta could improve long-term reshape effects.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-bo Song ◽  
Po-yuan Hu ◽  
Xi-jie Wu ◽  
Yong Sun ◽  
Shi-hao Cai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is a lethal event with a high mortality rate and requires emergency intervention. The goal of salvage surgery is to keep the patient alive by addressing the problems of severe aortic regurgitation, tamponade, primary tear and malperfusion of organs,and, if possible, to prevent the late dissection-related complications in the proximal and downstream aorta. No standard treatment or techniques have been determined for this disease. We aim to describe a modified elephant trunk technique for acute type A aortic dissection and report the short-term outcomes of this surgical technique. Methods From February 2018 to August 2019, 16 patients who were diagnosed with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent surgery with the modified frozen elephant trunk technique procedure at Xiamen Heart Centre (9men; age, 59.21±11.67 years). All perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed. We measured the diameters of the ascending aorta, aortic arch and descending aorta on the bifurcation of the pulmonary and abdominal aortas and compared the diameters at admission, before discharge, and 3 months after discharge. Results Fifteen patients (93.8%)had hypertension and poor blood control management. Operative mortality was 6.25%. The primary tears were located in the lesser curve of the aortic arch in 5 patients (31.3%), in the ascending aorta in 9 patients (56.3%), and no entry was found in 2 patients (12.5%). The dissection extended to the iliac artery in 14 patients (87.6%) and to the distal descending aorta in 2 patients (12.5%). The time of cardiopulmonary bypass(CPB),cross-clamping and cerebral perfusion were 215± 40.5,140.8±32.3, and 23±6 minutes, respectively. Aortic valve plasty was performed in 15 patients (93.8%). Additionally, the Bentall procedure and coronary artery repair were performed in 1 patient each (6.3%), respectively. The diameters at all levels were greater before discharge than those when on admission to the hospital, except for the diameter of the aortic arch. After 3 months, the diameters at the aortic arch, descending aorta of the diaphragm, bifurcation of the pulmonary artery had increased, but the diameter at the bifurcation level of the common iliac artery had changed little. Only the diameter of the distal stent aorta had increased significantly. Conclusion The modified frozen elephant trunk technique for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is safe and feasible, and it could be used for organ malperfusion as well. Short-term outcomes are encouraging, but long-term outcomes require further investigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-bo Song ◽  
Xi-jie Wu ◽  
Yong Sun ◽  
Shi-hao Cai ◽  
Po-yuan Hu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is often fatal, with a high mortality rate and requiring emergency intervention. Salvage surgery aims to keep the patient alive by addressing severe aortic regurgitation, tamponade, primary tear, and organ malperfusion and, if possible, prevent the late dissection-related complications in the proximal and downstream aorta. Unfortunately, no optimal standard treatment or technique to treat this disease exists. Total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique plays an important role in treating acute type A aortic dissection. We aim to describe a modified elephant trunk technique and report its short-term outcomes. Methods From February 2018 to August 2019, 16 patients diagnosed with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent surgery with the modified frozen elephant trunk technique at Xiamen Heart Center (male/female: 9/7; average age: 56.1 ± 7.6 years). All perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed. We measured the diameters of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta on the bifurcation of the pulmonary and abdominal aortas and compared the diameters at admission, before discharge, and 3 months after discharge. Results Fifteen patients (93.8%) had hypertension. The primary tears were located in the lesser curvature of the aortic arch and ascending aorta in 5 (31.3%) and 9 patients (56.3%), respectively, and no entry was found in 2 patients (12.5%). The dissection extended to the iliac artery and distal descending aorta in 14 (87.6%) and 2 patients (12.5%), respectively. The duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), cross-clamping, and antegrade cerebral perfusion were 215.8 ± 40.5, 140.8 ± 32.3, and 55.1 ± 15.2 min, respectively. Aortic valve repair was performed in 15 patients (93.8%). Bentall procedure was performed in one patient (6.3%). Another patient received coronary artery repair (6.3%). The diameters at all levels were greater on discharge than those on admission, except the aortic arch. After 3 months, the true lumen diameter distal to the frozen elephant trunk increased, indicating false lumen thrombosis and/or aortic remodeling. Conclusions The modified frozen elephant trunk technique for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is safe and feasible and could be used for organ malperfusion. Short-term outcomes are encouraging, but long-term outcomes require further investigation.


2020 ◽  
Vol 271 (5) ◽  
pp. 978-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kexiang Liu ◽  
Cuilin Zhu ◽  
Xiaomei Zheng ◽  
Tiance Wang ◽  
Rihao Xu ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shi-bo Song ◽  
Po-yuan Hu ◽  
Xi-jie Wu ◽  
Yong Sun ◽  
Shi-hao Cai ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is often fatal, with a high mortality rate and requiring emergency intervention. Salvage surgery aims to keep the patient alive by addressing severe aortic regurgitation, tamponade, primary tear, and organ malperfusion and, if possible, prevent the late dissection-related complications in the proximal and downstream aorta. Unfortunately, no optimal standard treatment or technique to treat this disease exists. Total arch replacement with frozen elephant trunk technique plays an important role in treating acute type A aortic dissection. We aim to describe a modified elephant trunk technique and report its short-term outcomes.Methods: From February 2018 to August 2019, 16 patients diagnosed with acute Stanford type A aortic dissection underwent surgery with the modified frozen elephant trunk technique at Xiamen Heart Center (male/female: 9/7; average age: 59.21±11.67 years). All perioperative variables were recorded and analyzed. We measured the diameters of the ascending aorta, aortic arch, and descending aorta on the bifurcation of the pulmonary and abdominal aortas and compared the diameters at admission, before discharge, and 3 months after discharge. Results: Fifteen patients (93.8%) had hypertension. The primary tears were located in the lesser curvature of the aortic arch and ascending aorta in 5 (31.3%) and 9 patients (56.3%), respectively, and no entry was found in 2 patients (12.5%). The dissection extended to the iliac artery and distal descending aorta in 14 (87.6%) and 2 patients (12.5%), respectively. The duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB),cross-clamping, and antegrade cerebral perfusion were 215.8± 40.5, 140.8±32.3, and 55.1±15.2 minutes, respectively. Aortic valve repair was performed in 15 patients (93.8%). Bentall procedure was performed in one patient (6.3%). Another patient received coronary artery repair (6.3%). The diameters at all levels were greater on discharge than those on admission, except the aortic arch. After 3 months, the true lumen diameter distal to the frozen elephant trunk increased, indicating false lumen thrombosis and/or aortic remodeling.Conclusions: The modified frozen elephant trunk technique for acute Stanford type A aortic dissection is safe and feasible and could be used for organ malperfusion. Short-term outcomes are encouraging, but long-term outcomes require further investigation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document