scholarly journals Preoperative Localization of Breast MRI Lesions: MRI-guided Marker Placement With Radioactive Seed Localization as an Alternative to MRI-guided Wire Localization

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 250-258
Author(s):  
Nicole Saphier ◽  
Jessica Kondraciuk ◽  
Elizabeth Morris ◽  
Blanca Bernard-Davila ◽  
Victoria Mango

Abstract Objective Preoperative MRI-guided wire localization (MWL) presents challenges to both the physician and patient. In this study, we examined the efficiency and outcome of MRI-guided marker placement followed by mammographic-guided radioactive seed localization (MMP/RSL) as an alternative localization method. The primary outcome parameter was pathology upon excision. The secondary outcome parameters were total procedure time and clinical indication for localization. Methods A retrospective review of a large tertiary cancer center’s breast imaging database was performed. Records of 21 patients with MMP/RSL (24 markers) from August 2013 to January 2019 were compared with 34 patients receiving MWL (48 wires) from January 2016 to January 2019. Multiple factors, including age, prelocalization pathology, postsurgical pathology, concordance, re-excision rates, and total procedure time required for each technique, were compared. Univariate and descriptive statistical analyses were performed. Results Mean patient age in years (MMP/RSL = 54.1 ± 13.1, MWL = 55.1 ± 10.8, P = 0.389), time in MR scanner in minutes (MMP/RSL = 31.7 ± 12.0, MWL = 35.8 ± 13.1, P = 0.678), and postsurgical pathology malignancy rates (MMP/RSL = 71.4%, MWL = 65.7%, P = 0.7715) were similar without statistically significant differences. As expected, the mean total procedure time was slightly longer without a statistically significant difference (47.3 ± 19.8 min versus 35.8 ± 13.1 min, P = 0.922) for the MMP/RSL group. All patients in both groups underwent successful localization with 100% radiologic-pathology concordance. Re-excision rates were lower for the MMP/RSL group (9.5%) versus the MWL group (16.7%); however, they were not found to be statistically significant (P = 0.7104). Conclusion MMP/RSL is a feasible alternative to MWL and may alleviate many challenges presented by MWL. Further studies are needed.

2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 3268-3272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emilia J. Diego ◽  
Atilla Soran ◽  
Kandace P. McGuire ◽  
Corinne Costellic ◽  
Ronald R. Johnson ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 290-295
Author(s):  
Esther Hwang ◽  
Jacob Kamen ◽  
Emily B. Sonnenblick ◽  
Elisa Port ◽  
Janet Szabo ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 151-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica V. Bloomquist ◽  
Nicolas Ajkay ◽  
Sujata Patil ◽  
Abigail E. Collett ◽  
Thomas G. Frazier ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monica Da Silva ◽  
Jessica Porembka ◽  
Ali A. Mokdad ◽  
Stephen Seiler ◽  
James Huth ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
pp. 153-157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jenevieve H. Hughes ◽  
Mark C. Mason ◽  
Richard J. Gray ◽  
Sarah A. McLaughlin ◽  
Amy C. Degnim ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 68 (4) ◽  
pp. 447-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vi Thuy Tran ◽  
Julie David ◽  
Erica Patocskai ◽  
Mathieu Zummo-Soucy ◽  
Rami Younan ◽  
...  

Purpose Radioactive seed localization (RSL) uses a titanium seed labeled with iodine-125 energy for surgery of nonpalpable breast lesions. RSL facilitates radiology–surgery scheduling and allows for improved oncoplasty compared with wire localization (WL). The purpose of this work was to compare the 2 techniques. Methods We performed a retrospective study of all breast lesions operated with RSL between February 2013 and March 2015 at our university institution, and compared with an equivalent number of surgeries performed with a single WL. Imaging and pathology reports were reviewed for information on guidance mode, accuracy of targeting, nature of excised lesion, size and volume of surgical specimen, status of margins, and reinterventions. Results A total of 254 lesions (247 women) were excised with RSL and compared with 257 lesions (244 women) whose surgery was guided by WL. Both groups were comparable in lesion pathology, guidance mode for RSL or WL positioning, and accuracy of targeting (98% correct). Mean delay between biopsy and surgery was 84 days for RSL versus 103 after WL ( P = .04). No differences were noted after RSL or WL for surgical specimen mean weight, largest diameter, and volume excised. For malignancies, the rate of positive margins was comparable (2.8%-3%), with 5 of 10 women in the RSL group who underwent a second surgery displaying residual malignancy compared with 3 of 9 women in the WL group. Conclusions RSL is safe and accurate, and has comparable surgical endpoints to WL. Because RSL offers flexible scheduling and facilitated oncoplasty, RSL may replace WL for resection of nonpalpable single breast lesions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document