Scott Family: The Parentage Of Archbishop Rotherham

1877 ◽  
Vol s5-VII (182) ◽  
pp. 490-491
Author(s):  
James Greenstreet
Keyword(s):  
Author(s):  
John L. Ward ◽  
Canh Tran

A large family business in banking and ranching is shifting leadership to the next generation and has developed a protocol to select board members by consensus. However, when the selection occurs, it is not made in accordance with the protocol, and a third-generation family member questions why the selection rules were changed by second-generation members without input or vote. Highlights the growing pains of developing fair processes and guidelines for nominating and selecting board members, meeting family expectations, communicating with constituents, and encouraging active roles in governance at the cousin-stage of a family business.


1878 ◽  
Vol s5-IX (229) ◽  
pp. 391-391
Author(s):  
W. Rotherham
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. 69-95
Author(s):  
Ruth. Clayton Windscheffel
Keyword(s):  

1877 ◽  
Vol s5-VIII (204) ◽  
pp. 411-411 ◽  
Author(s):  
Edward Scott
Keyword(s):  

1878 ◽  
Vol s5-IX (211) ◽  
pp. 37-37
Author(s):  
Sywl
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 1047-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
John Chisholm ◽  
Ekaterina B. Fokina ◽  
Sergey S. Goncharov ◽  
Valentina S. Harizanov ◽  
Julia F. Knight ◽  
...  

AbstractWe show that for every computable limit ordinal α, there is a computable structure that is categorical, but not relatively categorical (equivalently, it does not have a formally Scott family). We also show that for every computable limit ordinal α, there is a computable structure with an additional relation R that is intrinsically on , but not relatively intrinsically on (equivalently, it is not definable by a computable Σα formula with finitely many parameters). Earlier results in [7], [10], and [8] establish the same facts for computable successor ordinals α.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document