Engaging Payers to Transform Treatment of Substance Use Disorders

Author(s):  
Samantha Arsenault

Changing how addiction treatment is paid for is critical to improving the quality of these services and increasing patient access to more effective care. Currently, several aspects of the payment system for substance use disorder treatment services perpetuate outdated care models through perverse incentives that hinder adoption of best practices—for example, fee-for-service payments that incentivize high-intensity acute treatment episodes rather than chronic disease management. These payment practices are undergoing scrutiny and many changes have already begun to transform treatment policies. Recognizing a turning point for the engagement of third-party payers and an impetus for progressive payment reform, Shatterproof, a national nonprofit organization, partnered with health insurers to advance the substance use disorder treatment system in the United States and developed eight principles of care. This chapter describes this work and changes to payment models to better support patient needs, community and public health, and the interests of private insurers and health care providers.

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 24-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristoffer Nordheim ◽  
Espen Walderhaug ◽  
Ståle Alstadius ◽  
Ann Kern-Godal ◽  
Espen Arnevik ◽  
...  

Dropout from substance use disorder treatment is usually investigated and understood from a perspective of quantitative patient-related factors. Patients’ own perspectives (user perspective) are rarely reported. This study, therefore, aimed to explore patients’ own understanding of their dropout from residential substance use disorder treatment. The participants were 15 males and females, aged 19–29 years, who had dropped out of residential substance use disorder treatment at the Department of Addiction Treatment, Oslo University Hospital, Norway. Qualitative methodology with semistructured interviews was used to explore how the participants described their dropout and their reasons for doing so. Thematic analysis was used as the framework for analyzing the data derived from the interviews. Dropout had different meanings for different participants. It was understood as a break from treatment, as an end to treatment, or as a means of reduced treatment intensity. Against that background, four main themes for dropout were found: drug craving, negative emotions, personal contact, and activity. Patient and treatment factors seem to interact when participants explore reasons for their dropout. A complex pattern of variables is involved. As remedies, participants suggested that substance use disorder treatment should provide more focus on drug craving and training to understand and tolerate emotional discomfort. They also wanted closer contact with the staff during treatment, more activities, and rigorous posttreatment follow-up. These findings from the user perspective have important implications for substance use disorder treatment, clinical and social work practice, management, and research.


2017 ◽  
Vol 27 (6) ◽  
pp. 639-645 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Timko ◽  
Katherine J. Hoggatt ◽  
Frances M. Wu ◽  
Amanda Tjemsland ◽  
Michael Cucciare ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 10 (S1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amity E Quinn ◽  
Connie M Horgan ◽  
Mary Brolin ◽  
Maureen T Stewart ◽  
Dominic Hodgkin ◽  
...  

Addiction ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 112 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-133 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Stuart ◽  
Colleen L. Barry ◽  
Julie M. Donohue ◽  
Shelly F. Greenfield ◽  
Kenneth Duckworth ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document