Methodological Confusion in Armchair and Experimental Philosophy

Author(s):  
Avner Baz

The chapter closely examines John Hawthorne’s introduction of the “lottery paradox” in Knowledge and Lotteries (2004) and Joshua Knobe and Sean Nichols’ “Experimental Philosophy Manifesto” (2008), together with other related works of experimental philosophers, with the aim of illustrating the deep confusion about the method of cases on the part of both its armchair practitioners and their experimental critics/reformers. The examination of these texts also serves to raise some of the main issues that will be discussed in subsequent chapters.

2007 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 301-319 ◽  
Author(s):  
IGOR DOUVEN ◽  
JAN-WILLEM ROMEIJN

List and Pettit have stated an impossibility theorem about the aggregation of individual opinion states. Building on recent work on the lottery paradox, this paper offers a variation on that result. The present result places different constraints on the voting agenda and the domain of profiles, but it covers a larger class of voting rules, which need not satisfy the proposition-wise independence of votes.


Analysis ◽  
1987 ◽  
Vol 47 (4) ◽  
pp. 213-216
Author(s):  
R. P. Loui

2013 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 283-292
Author(s):  
Patrick Bondy ◽  

2003 ◽  
Vol 112 (3) ◽  
pp. 395-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Douven

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document