Induction of Anesthesia and Tracheal Intubation with Sevoflurane in Adults

1996 ◽  
Vol 85 (3) ◽  
pp. 536-543. ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Muzi ◽  
B.J. Robinson ◽  
T.J. Ebert ◽  
T.J. O'Brien

Background The speed, quality, and cost of mask induction of anesthesia and laryngeal mask airway insertion or tracheal intubation were studied in young non-premedicated volunteers given high inspired concentrations of sevoflurane (6 to 7%). Methods Twenty healthy persons who were 19 to 32 years old participated three times, received 6 l/min fresh gas flow, and were randomized to receive 6 to 7% sevoflurane in 66% nitrous oxide/28% oxygen by face mask until tracheal intubation (treatment 1) or until laryngeal mask airway insertion (treatment 3), or 6 to 7% sevoflurane without nitrous oxide to tracheal intubation (treatment 2). Participants exhaled to residual volume and took three vital capacity breaths of the gas mixture; thereafter ventilation was manually assisted. The time of exposure to the inhaled gas was varied for consecutive participants. It was either increased or decreased by 30-sec increments based on the failure or success of the preceding volunteer's response to laryngoscopy and intubation after a preselected exposure time. Failure was defined as poor jaw relaxation, coughing or bucking, or inadequate vocal cord relaxation. Results Loss of the lid-lash reflex in unpremedicated young volunteers was achieved in 1 min and did not differ among groups. Average time (and 95% confidence interval) for acceptable conditions for LMA insertion was achieved in 1.7 (0.7 to 2.7) min, and all participants had an immediate return of spontaneous ventilation. The time for acceptable tracheal intubating conditions after manual hyperventilation by mask was 4.7 (3.7 to 5.7) min and 6.4 (5.1 to 7.7) min in treatments 1 and 2, respectively. There were no cases of increased secretions or laryngospasm. The incidence of breath holding and expiratory stridor ("crowing") was 7.5% and 25%, respectively, during treatment 1 and 15% and 40%, respectively, during treatment 2. Conclusions The induction of anesthesia to loss of lid reflex in young non-premedicated adults approaches the speed of intravenous induction techniques. No untoward airway responses were noted during mask induction of anesthesia with a three-breath technique. In response to intubation, no adverse airway responses, including jaw tightness, laryngospasm, and excessive coughing or bucking, occurred in participants whose duration of mask administration of sevoflurane met the appropriate times (as determined in this study).

2005 ◽  
Vol 103 (3) ◽  
pp. 495-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shahbaz R. Arain ◽  
Hariharan Shankar ◽  
Thomas J. Ebert

Background Desflurane and sevoflurane have markedly different pungencies. The tested hypothesis was that patients breathing equivalent concentrations of desflurane or sevoflurane through a laryngeal mask airway (LMA) would have similar responses. Methods After institutional review board approval and informed consent were obtained, 60 patients were enrolled and given intravenous midazolam (14 microg/kg) and fentanyl (1 microg/kg) 5 min before induction of anesthesia. The LMA was inserted at loss of consciousness after 2 mg/kg propofol. When spontaneous breathing returned, a randomly assigned volatile anesthetic was started at an inspired concentration of either 1.8% sevoflurane or 6% desflurane at a fresh gas flow of 6 l/min in air:oxygen (50:50). After 5 min, a controlled movement of the LMA took place. Three minutes later, the inspiratory anesthetic concentration was changed to either 3.6% sevoflurane or 12% desflurane for 3 min. A blinded observer recorded movements and airway events during the start of anesthetic, LMA movement, deepening of the anesthetic, and emergence before LMA removal. Results There were no differences at anesthetic start and LMA movement. Desflurane titration to 12% increased heart rate, increased mean arterial blood pressure, and initiated frequent coughing (53% vs. 0% sevoflurane) and body movements (47% vs. 0% sevoflurane). During emergence, there was a twofold greater incidence of coughing and a fivefold increase in breath holding in the desflurane group. Conclusions When airway responses to sevoflurane and desflurane were compared in elective surgical patients breathing through an LMA, there were significantly more adverse responses with desflurane at 12% concentrations and during emergence.


1994 ◽  
Vol 81 (3) ◽  
pp. 628-631 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masakazu Taguchi ◽  
Seiji Watanabe ◽  
Nobuaki Asakura ◽  
Shinichi Inomata

2017 ◽  
Vol 8 (4) ◽  
pp. 21-26
Author(s):  
S Gunaseelan ◽  
R Krishna Prabu

Background: Small dose of succinylcholine combined with propofol facilitates Laryngeal maskairway (LMA) insertion. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of two differentsmall doses of succinylcholine for LMA insertion.Aims and Objectives: The aim of our study is to compare the usefulness of two different doses of succinylcholine to facilitate the insertion of laryngeal mask airway under intravenous anaesthesia.Material and Methods: 70 patients of ASA I and II posted for elective day care procedure under general anaesthesia with Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) were randomly allocated into two groups of 35 each. 35 patients in group PS1 received Inj. propofol 2.0 mg/kg + succinylcholine 0.1 mg/kg (diluted to 2 ml). 35 patients in group PS2 received Inj. propofol 2.0 ml/kg + succinylcholine 0.2 mg/kg (diluted to 2 ml). During insertion of laryngeal mask airway jaw relaxation, gagging/coughing, head and limb movements, presence or absence of laryngospasm and duration of apnoea were noted.Results: Patients in PS2 had better conditions for LMA insertion, reduced the upper airway responses to the LMA insertion, and reduced the supplement doses of propofol compared to PS1.Conclusion: Succinylcholine in 0.2 mg/kg compared to 0.1kg provides optimal conditions for LMA insertion.Asian Journal of Medical Sciences Vol.8(4) 2017 21-26


2004 ◽  
Vol 100 (2) ◽  
pp. 260-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ron Flaishon ◽  
Alexander Sotman ◽  
Ron Ben-Abraham ◽  
Valery Rudick ◽  
David Varssano ◽  
...  

Background Airway management is the first step in resuscitation. The extraordinary conditions in mass casualty situations impose special difficulties in airway management, even for experienced caregivers. The authors evaluated whether wearing surgical attire or antichemical protective gear made any difference in anesthetists' success of airway control with either an endotracheal tube or a laryngeal mask airway. Methods Fifteen anesthetists with 2-5 yr of residency and wearing either full antichemical protective gear or surgical attire intubated or inserted laryngeal masks in 60 anesthetized patients. The study was performed in a prospective, randomized, crossover manner. The duration of intubation/insertion was measured from the time the device was grasped to the time a normal capnography recording was obtained. Results Endotracheal tubes were introduced significantly (P < 0.01) faster when the anesthetist wore surgical attire (31 +/- 7 vs. 54 +/- 24 s for protective gear), but the mean times necessary to successfully insert laryngeal masks were similar (44 +/- 20 s for surgical attire vs. 39 +/- 11 s for protective gear). Neither performance failure nor incidences of hypoxemia were recorded. Conclusions This first report in humans shows to what extent anesthetists' wearing of antichemical protective gear slows the time to intubate but not to insert a laryngeal mask airway compared with wearing surgical attire. Laryngeal mask airway insertion is faster than tracheal intubation when wearing protective gear, indicating its advantage for airway management when anesthetists wear antichemical protective gear. If chances for rapid and successful tracheal intubation under such chaotic conditions are poor, laryngeal mask airway insertion is a viable choice for airway management until a proper secured airway is obtainable.


2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hashem Jarineshin ◽  
Saeed Kashani ◽  
Majid Vatankhah ◽  
Alireza Abdulahzade Baghaee ◽  
Sahar Sattari ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document