Safety of the Balloon Catheter for Cervical Ripening in Outpatient Care

2019 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-7
Author(s):  
M. Diederen ◽  
J. S. M. Gommers ◽  
C. Wilkinson ◽  
D. Turnbull ◽  
B. W. J. Mol
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Peng ◽  
Ruobing Li ◽  
Shuguo Du ◽  
Heng Yin ◽  
Min Li ◽  
...  

Abstract Background This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the induction of labour in mid-trimester pregnancy using a double-balloon catheter (DBC) within 12 h versus within 12–24 h. Methods In this retrospective study, a total of 58 pregnant women at 14 + 0 weeks to 27 + 6 weeks of gestation were enrolled as research subjects, and they underwent the intended termination of pregnancy at our birth centre from January 1, 2017, to June 31, 2019. Based on the duration of DBC, the patients were divided into two groups, namely, the DBC group within 12 h and the DBC group within 12–24 h. Results All 58 cases were successful vaginal deliveries, and no one chose to undergo caesarean section. The success rate of induction (successful abortion of the foetus and placenta without the implementation of dilation and evacuation) was higher in the DBC group within 12–24 h (96.3%, 29/31) than in the DBC group within 12 h (71.0%, 18/27) (p < 0.05). Additionally, the time from DBC removal to delivery in the DBC group within 12–24 h was significantly shorter than that in the DBC group within 12 h (3.0 h versus 17.8 h) (p < 0.05), and the degree of cervical dilation after DBC removal in the DBC group within 12–24 h was larger than that in the DBC group within 12 h (p < 0.05). Conclusion In the clinic, the placement time of DBC generally lasts for approximately 12 h. However, considering that the cervical condition is immature in the mid-trimester, properly extending the placement time of DBC to 24 h will benefit cervical ripening and reduce the chance of dilation and evacuation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 131 ◽  
pp. 47S ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana DeCesare ◽  
Julie Decesare ◽  
Kimberly Manek

Author(s):  
Alexis C. Gimovsky ◽  
Amelie Pham ◽  
Martin Gimovsky ◽  
Abigail Wolf

Introduction This study aims to evaluate resident satisfaction with a novel simulation model for learning transcervical balloon catheter placement for mechanical cervical ripening. Study Design A descriptive pretest and post-test survey study of Obstetrics and Gynecology (OBGYN) residents was conducted at a single academic medical center using a low-cost model. Results Of 28 residents, 14 (50%) were recruited. 100% of participants completed the pretest and post-test survey. Residents agreed that both learning and achieving correct placement of a transcervical balloon catheter are difficult. Pretest and post-test comparisons were statistically different with respect to comfort (2.8 ± 1.5 vs. 4.0 ± 1.0, p = 0.03) and ease of learning (3.1 ± 0.8 vs. 4.1 ± 0.6, p ≤ 0.001). Discussion We present a novel simulation model that can be used by OBGYN residents in training for learning transcervical balloon catheter placement for mechanical cervical ripening. Key Points


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document