Traumatic Lumbar Nerve Root Avulsion: Evaluation Using Electrodiagnostic Studies and Magnetic Resonance Myelography

2004 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 182-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puneet Monga ◽  
Abrar Ahmed ◽  
G. R. Gupta ◽  
K. S. Rao
2015 ◽  
Vol 15 (9) ◽  
pp. 2103-2104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaaddin Nayman ◽  
Egemen Altan ◽  
Mustafa Koplay ◽  
Ali Sami Kıvrak

Author(s):  
Sara Mohamed Mahmoud Mabrouk ◽  
Hossam Abd El Hafiz Zaytoon ◽  
Ashraf Mohamed Farid ◽  
Rania Sobhy Abou Khadrah

Abstract Background Management of brachial plexopathy requires proper localization of the site and nature of nerve injury. Nerve conduction studies and electrophysiological studies (ED) are crucial when diagnosing brachial neuropathy but these do not determine the actual site of the lesion. Conventional MRI has been used to evaluate the brachial plexus. Still, it carried the disadvantage of the inability to provide multi-planar images that depict the entire length of the neural plexus .It might be difficult to differentiate the brachial plexus nerves from adjacent vascular structures. Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is an innovative imaging technique for direct imaging of the spinal nerves. Our study aims to detect the additive role of MRN in the diagnosis of brachial plexopathy over ED. Forty cases of clinically suspected and proved by clinical examination and ED—traumatic (N = 30) and non-traumatic (N = 10)—were included in our study. We compared MRN finding with results of clinical examination and ED. Results MRN findings showed that the root was involved in 80% of cases, trunks in 70% of cases affecting the middle trunk in 40% of cases, the middle and posterior cord in 25%, lateral cord in 50%, and terminal branches on 10% of cases. Ten percent of cases were normal according to MRN, and 90% had abnormal findings in the form of preganglionic nerve root avulsion in 30% of cases, mild perineural edema surrounding C6/7 nerve roots in 20%, lower brachial trunk high signal in 10%, complicated with pseudo meningocele in 20%, and with increased shoulder muscle T2 signal intensity with muscle atrophy in 10%. There were minimal differences between clinical examination finding and MRN findings, with very good agreement between electromyography and nerve conduction (p value < 0.05, with sensitivity and specificity values of 94.44% and 100%, respectively). Conclusion MRN is important in differentiating different types of nerve injuries, nerve root avulsion, and nerve edema, playing an important role in differentiating the site of nerve injury, both preganglionic or postganglionic and planning for treatment of the cause of nerve injury, either medical or surgical.


2001 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-284 ◽  
Author(s):  
Girolamo Moschilla ◽  
Swithin Song ◽  
Turab Chakera

2004 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 144-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. J. Hans ◽  
M. H. Reinges ◽  
T. Krings

1996 ◽  
Vol 3 (4) ◽  
pp. 172-175
Author(s):  
Ziad L. Deeb ◽  
Kevin J. Kelly ◽  
Richard H. Daffner

2004 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 306-309
Author(s):  
Victor R. DaSilva ◽  
Mubarak Al-Gahtany ◽  
Rajiv Midha ◽  
Dipanka Sarma ◽  
Perry Cooper

✓ Transdural herniation of the spinal cord, a rare but well-documented entity, has been reported sporadically for more than 25 years as a possible cause for various neurological signs and symptoms ranging from isolated sensory or motor findings to myelopathy and Brown–Séquard syndrome. The authors report, to the best of their knowledge, the first case of upper thoracic spinal cord herniation occurring after traumatic nerve root avulsion.


2014 ◽  
Vol 08 (01) ◽  
pp. e19-e27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Noguchi ◽  
Souichi Ohta ◽  
Ryosuke Kakinoki ◽  
Yukitoshi Kaizawa ◽  
Shuichi Matsuda

Radiology ◽  
1967 ◽  
Vol 89 (1) ◽  
pp. 101-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
George J. Alker ◽  
Franz E. Glasauer ◽  
John G. Zoll ◽  
Reinhold Schlagenhauff

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document