nerve root avulsion
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

69
(FIVE YEARS 7)

H-INDEX

17
(FIVE YEARS 1)

PeerJ ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. e12269
Author(s):  
Wenlai Guo ◽  
Bingbing Pei ◽  
Zehui Li ◽  
Xiao Lan Ou ◽  
Tianwen Sun ◽  
...  

Adult brachial plexus root avulsion can cause serious damage to nerve tissue and impair axonal regeneration, making the recovery of nerve function difficult. Nogo-A extracellular peptide residues 1-40 (NEP1-40) promote axonal regeneration by inhibiting the Nogo-66 receptor (NgR1), and poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide)-poly (ethylene glycol)-poly (D, L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA-PEG-PLGA) hydrogel can be used to fill in tissue defects and concurrently function to sustain the release of NEP1-40. In this study, we established an adult rat model of brachial plexus nerve root avulsion injury and conducted nerve root replantation. PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel combined with NEP1-40 was used to promote nerve regeneration and functional recovery in this rat model. Our results demonstrated that functional recovery was enhanced, and the survival rate of spinal anterior horn motoneurons was higher in rats that received a combination of PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel and NEP1-40 than in those receiving other treatments. The combined therapy also significantly increased the number of fluorescent retrogradely labeled neurons, muscle fiber diameter, and motor endplate area of the biceps brachii. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that the effects of PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel combined with NEP1-40 are superior to those of other therapies used to treat brachial plexus nerve root avulsion injury. Therefore, future studies should investigate the potential of PLGA-PEG-PLGA hydrogel as a primary treatment for brachial plexus root avulsion.


Author(s):  
Sara Mohamed Mahmoud Mabrouk ◽  
Hossam Abd El Hafiz Zaytoon ◽  
Ashraf Mohamed Farid ◽  
Rania Sobhy Abou Khadrah

Abstract Background Management of brachial plexopathy requires proper localization of the site and nature of nerve injury. Nerve conduction studies and electrophysiological studies (ED) are crucial when diagnosing brachial neuropathy but these do not determine the actual site of the lesion. Conventional MRI has been used to evaluate the brachial plexus. Still, it carried the disadvantage of the inability to provide multi-planar images that depict the entire length of the neural plexus .It might be difficult to differentiate the brachial plexus nerves from adjacent vascular structures. Magnetic resonance neurography (MRN) is an innovative imaging technique for direct imaging of the spinal nerves. Our study aims to detect the additive role of MRN in the diagnosis of brachial plexopathy over ED. Forty cases of clinically suspected and proved by clinical examination and ED—traumatic (N = 30) and non-traumatic (N = 10)—were included in our study. We compared MRN finding with results of clinical examination and ED. Results MRN findings showed that the root was involved in 80% of cases, trunks in 70% of cases affecting the middle trunk in 40% of cases, the middle and posterior cord in 25%, lateral cord in 50%, and terminal branches on 10% of cases. Ten percent of cases were normal according to MRN, and 90% had abnormal findings in the form of preganglionic nerve root avulsion in 30% of cases, mild perineural edema surrounding C6/7 nerve roots in 20%, lower brachial trunk high signal in 10%, complicated with pseudo meningocele in 20%, and with increased shoulder muscle T2 signal intensity with muscle atrophy in 10%. There were minimal differences between clinical examination finding and MRN findings, with very good agreement between electromyography and nerve conduction (p value < 0.05, with sensitivity and specificity values of 94.44% and 100%, respectively). Conclusion MRN is important in differentiating different types of nerve injuries, nerve root avulsion, and nerve edema, playing an important role in differentiating the site of nerve injury, both preganglionic or postganglionic and planning for treatment of the cause of nerve injury, either medical or surgical.


Author(s):  
Brandon W. Smith ◽  
Kate W. C. Chang ◽  
Hemant A. Parmar ◽  
Mohannad Ibrahim ◽  
Lynda J. S. Yang

OBJECTIVE The evaluation, treatment, and prognosis of neonatal brachial plexus palsy (NBPP) continues to have many areas of debate, including the use of ancillary testing. Given the continued improvement in imaging, it is important to revisit its utility. Nerve root avulsions have historically been identified by the presence of pseudomeningoceles or visible ruptures. This “all-or-none” definition of nerve root avulsions has many implications for the understanding and management of NBPP, especially as characterization of the proximal nerve root as a potential donor remains critical. This study examined the ability of high-resolution MRI to more specifically define the anatomy of nerve root avulsions by individually examining the ventral and dorsal rootlets as they exit the spinal cord. METHODS This is a retrospective review of patients who had undergone brachial plexus protocol MRI for clinical evaluation of NBPP at a single institution. Each MR image was independently reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist, who was blinded to both established diagnosis/surgical findings and laterality. Each dorsal and ventral nerve rootlet bilaterally from C5 to T1 was evaluated from the spinal cord to its exit in the neuroforamen. Each rootlet was classified as avulsed, intact, or undeterminable. RESULTS Sixty infants underwent brachial plexus protocol MRI from 2010 to 2018. All infants were included in this study. Six hundred individual rootlets were analyzed. There were 49 avulsed nerve rootlets in this cohort. Twenty-nine (59%) combined dorsal/ventral avulsions involved both the ventral and dorsal rootlets, and 20 (41%) were either isolated ventral or isolated dorsal rootlet avulsions. Of the isolated avulsion injuries, 13 (65%) were dorsal only, meaning that the motor rootlets were intact. CONCLUSIONS A closer look at nerve root avulsions with MRI demonstrates a significant prevalence (approximately 41%) of isolated dorsal or ventral nerve rootlet disruptions. This finding implies that nerve roots previously labeled as “avulsed” but with only isolated dorsal (sensory) rootlet avulsion can yet provide donor fascicles in reconstruction strategies. A majority (99%) of the rootlets can be clearly visualized with MRI. These findings may significantly impact the clinical understanding of neonatal brachial plexus injury and its treatment.


2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 262
Author(s):  
Ramsis Ghaly ◽  
Armen Haroutunian ◽  
Gevorg Grigoryan ◽  
Jessica A. Patricoski ◽  
Kenneth D. Candido ◽  
...  

Background: Cervical nerve root avulsion is a well-documented result of high-velocity motor vehicle accidents (MVAs). In up to 21% of cases, preganglionic cervical root avulsion can result in a complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) impacting the quality of life for patients already impaired by motor, sensory, and autonomic dysfunction. The optimal treatment strategies include repeated stellate ganglion blocks (SBGs). Case Description: A 43-year-old male sustained a high-velocity MVA resulting in the left C8 nerve root avulsion. This resulted in weakness in the C8 distribution, tactile allodynia, and dysesthesias. The magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated an abnormal signal ventral to the C8–T1 level. As the patient was not considered a candidate for surgical intervention secondary to the attendant brachial plexus injury, a C7–C8 epidural steroid injection was performed; this did not provide improvement. Before placing a spinal cord stimulator, the patient underwent a series of six ultrasound-guided SBGs performed 2 weeks apart; there was 75% improvement in pain and strength. Six years later, the patient continues to do well while receiving SBGs 4 times a year. Conclusion: A preganglionic cervical nerve root avulsion should not be a contraindication for a stellate ganglion block in a patient with established CRPS.


2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhi-bin Zhou ◽  
Gao-xiang Huang ◽  
Jia-jia Lu ◽  
Jun Ma ◽  
Qi-jun Yuan ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5) ◽  
pp. 647-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroki Oda ◽  
Souichi Ohta ◽  
Ryosuke Ikeguchi ◽  
Takashi Noguchi ◽  
Yukitoshi Kaizawa ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
pp. 76-77
Author(s):  
Daniela Distefano ◽  
Abhay Varma

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document