In adult patients with acute nonradicular low back pain, does early increased activity, as compared with bed rest, result in pain relief and increased functionality?

Background: Failed back surgery syndrome is a common clinical entity for which spinal cord stimulation has been found to be an effective mode of analgesia, but with variable success rates. Objective: To determine if focal stimulation of the dorsal columns with a transverse tripolar lead might achieve deeper penetration of the electrical stimulus into the spinal cord and therefore provide greater analgesia to the back. Design: Case report. Methods: We describe a 42-year-old female with failed back surgery syndrome that had greater back pain than leg pain. The tripolar lead configuration was achieved by placing percutaneously an octapolar lead in the spinal midline followed by 2 adjacent quadripolar leads, advanced to the T7-T10 vertebral bodies. Results: Tripolar stimulation pattern resulted in more than 70% pain relief in this patient during the screening trial, while stimulation of one or 2 electrodes only provided 20% pain relief. After implantation of a permanent tripolar electrode system with a single rechargeable battery, the pain relief was maintained for one year. Conclusion: This is case report describing a case of a patient with chronic low back pain with a diagnosis of failed back surgery syndrome in which transverse tripolar stimulation using an octapolar and 2 quadripolar leads appeared to be beneficial. The transverse tripolar system consists of a central cathode surrounded by anodes, using 3 leads. This arrangement may contribute to maximum dorsal column stimulation with minimal dorsal root stimulation and provide analgesia to the lower back. Key words: Epidural, low back pain, spinal cord stimulation, failed back surgery syndrome, tripolar stimulation

Download Full-text

P.087 RETRACTION - Low back pain relief with a new 32-contact surgical lead and neural targeting algorithm

Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques ◽

10.1017/cjn.2017.214 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 44 (6) ◽

pp. 763-763

Author(s):

J. Pilitisis ◽

G. Barolat ◽

J. Rosenow ◽

J. Brennan ◽

A. Bailey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Pain Relief ◽

Low Back

Download Full-text

Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks in Managing Chronic Facet Joint Pain: One-Year Follow-up of a Randomized, Double-Blind Controlled Trial: Clinical Trial NCT00355914

January 2018 - Pain Physician ◽

10.36076/ppj.2008/11/121 ◽

2008 ◽

Vol 2;11 (3;2) ◽

pp. 121-132

Author(s):

Laxmaiah Manchikanti

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Pain Relief ◽

Local Anesthetic ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Low Back ◽

Lumbar Facet Joint ◽

Nerve Blocks ◽

Lumbar Facet

Background: Lumbar facet joints have been implicated as the source of chronic pain in 15% to 45% of patients with chronic low back pain. Various therapeutic techniques including intraarticular injections, medial branch blocks, and radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar facet joint nerves have been described in the alleviation of chronic low back pain of facet joint origin. Objective: The study was conducted to determine the clinical effectiveness of therapeutic local anesthetic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks with or without steroid in managing chronic function-limiting low back pain of facet joint origin. Design: A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. Setting: An interventional pain management setting in the United States. Methods: This study included 60 patients in Group I with local anesthetic and 60 patients in Group II with local anesthetic and steroid. The inclusion criteria was based on the positive response to the diagnostic controlled comparative local anesthetic lumbar facet joint blocks. Outcome measures: Numeric pain scores, Oswestry Disability Index, opioid intake, and work status. All outcome assessments were performed at baseline, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Results: Significant improvement with significant pain relief (> 50%) and functional improvement (> 40%) were observed in 82% and 85% in Group I, with significant pain relief in over 82% of the patients and improvement in functional status in 78% of the patients. Based on the results of the present study, it appears that patients may experience significant pain relief 44 to 45 weeks of 1 year, requiring approximately 3 to 4 treatments with an average relief of 15 weeks per episode of treatment. Conclusion: Therapeutic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks, with or without steroid, may provide a management option for chronic function-limiting low back pain of facet joint origin. Key words: Chronic low back pain, lumbar facet or zygapophysial joint pain, facet joint nerve or medial branch blocks, comparative controlled local anesthetic blocks, therapeutic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks

Download Full-text

An Update of the Systematic Assessment of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Lumbar Facet Joint Nerve Blocks

January 2018 - Pain Physician ◽

10.36076/ppj.2012/15/e869 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 6;15 (6;12) ◽

pp. E869-E907

Author(s):

Frank J.E. Falco

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Pain Relief ◽

Diagnostic Accuracy ◽

Chronic Low Back Pain ◽

Facet Joint ◽

Low Back ◽

Lumbar Facet Joint ◽

Nerve Blocks ◽

Lumbar Facet

Background: Lumbar facet joints are a well recognized source of low back pain and referred pain in the lower extremity in patients with chronic low back pain. Conventional clinical features and other non-invasive diagnostic modalities are unreliable in diagnosing lumbar zygapophysial joint pain. Controlled diagnostic studies with at least 80% pain relief as the criterion standard have shown the prevalence of lumbar facet joint pain to be 16% to 41% of patients with chronic low back pain without disc displacement or radiculitis, with a false-positive rate of 17% to 49% with a single diagnostic block. Study Design: A systematic review of the diagnostic accuracy of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks. Objective: To determine and update the diagnostic accuracy of lumbar facet joint nerve blocks in the assessment of chronic low back pain. Methods: A methodological quality assessment of included studies was performed using Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies (QAREL). Only diagnostic accuracy studies meeting at least 50% of the designated inclusion criteria were utilized for analysis. Studies scoring less than 50% are presented descriptively and analyzed critically. The level of evidence was classified as good, fair, and limited or poor based on the quality of evidence developed by the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF). Data sources included relevant literature identified through searches of PubMed and EMBASE from 1966 to June 2012, and manual searches of the bibliographies of known primary and review articles. Outcome Measures: Studies must have been performed utilizing controlled local anesthetic blocks. Pain relief was categorized as at least 50% pain relief from baseline pain and the ability to perform previously painful movements. Results: A total of 25 diagnostic accuracy studies were included. Of these, one study evaluated 50% to 74% relief as criterion standard with a single block with prevalence of 48%, 4 studies evaluated 75% to 100% relief as the criterion standard with a single block with a prevalence of 31% to 61%, 5 studies evaluated 50% to 74% relief as the criterion standard with controlled blocks with a prevalence of 15% to 61%, and 13 studies evaluated 75% to 100% relief as the criterion standard with controlled blocks with a prevalence of 25% to 45% in heterogenous populations. False-positive rates ranged from 17% to 66% in the 50% to 74% pain relief group and 27% to 49% with at least 75% relief as the criterion standard. Based on this evaluation, the evidence showed that there is good evidence for diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks with 75% to 100% pain relief as the criterion standard with dual blocks and fair evidence with 50% to 74% pain relief as the criterion standard with controlled diagnostic blocks; however, the evidence is poor with single diagnostic blocks of 50% to 74%, and limited for 75% or more pain relief as the criterion standard. Limitations: The shortcomings of this systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic lumbar facet joint nerve blocks include a paucity of literature and continued debate on an appropriate gold standard. Conclusion: There is good evidence for diagnostic facet joint nerve blocks with 75% to 100% pain relief as the criterion standard with dual blocks, with fair evidence with 50% to 74% pain relief. Key words: Chronic low back pain, lumbar facet or zygapophysial joint pain, facet joint nerve blocks, medial branch blocks, controlled comparative local anesthetic blocks

Download Full-text

Radiofrequency Denervation of the Lumbar Zygapophysial Joints: 10-Year Prospective Clinical Audit

January 2018 - Pain Physician ◽

10.36076/ppj.2007/10/291 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 2;10 (3;2) ◽

pp. 291-299

Author(s):

Michael Gofeld

Keyword(s):

Low Back Pain ◽

Back Pain ◽

Pain Relief ◽

Patient Selection ◽

Clinical Audit ◽

Low Back ◽

Zygapophysial Joint ◽

Radiofrequency Neurotomy ◽

Radiofrequency Denervation

Background: Evidence for the efficacy of zygapophysial joint nerve radiofrequency neurotomy has remained controversial. Two randomized controlled trials showed positive results, but two others demonstrated no benefit. One carefully performed prospective trial confirmed high efficacy and lasting pain relief after the procedure; however, selection criteria for this study were superfluous, which resulted in a small number of patients available for follow up. Objectives: A large clinical audit with routine patient selection and use of appropriate technique was undertaken to determine the effect of radiofrequency neurotomy of the lumbar facet joints for relief of chronic low back pain. Design: Prospective clinical audit for quality was conducted in the pain clinic affiliated with a tertiary care teaching hospital. Setting: An interventional pain management setting in Canada. Methods: All patients with low back pain of more than 6 months’ duration, with or without non-radicular radiation to the buttock, hip, and leg were included. From January 1991 to December 2000, eligible patients underwent standardized diagnostic work-up, which included a self-reported pain questionnaire, physical examination, review of imaging studies, and diagnostic blockades. Those with an appropriate response to comparative double diagnostic blocks underwent standardized radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar zygapophysial joints. Patients were asked to estimate total perceived pain reduction (on a scale from 0% to 100%) at 6 weeks and at 6, 12, and 24 months after the procedure. Results: Of the 209 patients, 174 completed the study, and 35 were lost to follow-up or did not provide complete data for assessment. Of the 174 patients with complete data, 55 (31.6%) experienced no benefit from the procedure. One hundred and nineteen patients (68.4%) had good (> 50%) to excellent (> 80%) pain relief lasting from 6 to 24 months. Conclusion: This large, prospective clinical audit indicates that proper patient selection and anatomically correct radiofrequency denervation of the lumbar zygapophysial joints provide long-term pain relief in a routine clinical setting. Key words: low back pain, lumbar zygapophysial joint, radiofrequency denervation, clinical audit

Download Full-text