Clinical Recommendation Radical Trachelectomy for Fertility Preservation in Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 659-666 ◽  
Author(s):  
Achim Schneider ◽  
Evrim Erdemoglu ◽  
Vito Chiantera ◽  
Nicholas Reed ◽  
Philippe Morice ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 26 (1) ◽  
pp. 163-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshifumi Kasuga ◽  
Hiroshi Nishio ◽  
Kei Miyakoshi ◽  
Suguru Sato ◽  
Juri Sugiyama ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. S6
Author(s):  
M.K. Kim ◽  
C.H. Choi ◽  
T. Song ◽  
H.S. Park ◽  
Y-Y. Lee ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-001782
Author(s):  
Blanca Segarra-Vidal ◽  
Jan Persson ◽  
Henrik Falconer

Radical trachelectomy is the ‘cornerstone’ of fertility-sparing surgery in patients with early-stage cervical cancer wishing to preserve fertility. Growing evidence has demonstrated the oncologic safety and subsequent favorable pregnancy outcomes in well-selected cases. In the absence of prospective trials, the decision on the appropriate surgical approach (vaginal, open, or minimally invasive surgery) should be based on local resources and surgeons’ preferences. Radical trachelectomy has the potential to preserve fertility in a large proportion of women with early-stage cervical cancer. However, prematurity and premature rupture of membranes are common obstetric complications after radical trachelectomy for cervical cancer. A multidisciplinary approach is crucial to optimize the balance between oncologic and obstetric outcomes. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated overview of the technical, oncologic, and obstetric aspects of radical trachelectomy.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 842-842
Author(s):  
Kotaro Shimura ◽  
Seiji Mabuchi

Radical trachelectomy combined with pelvic lymphadenectomy has been used to treat patients with early-stage cervical cancer who wish to preserve their fertility. Vaginal, abdominal, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches have been employed during this procedure, but all cause peritoneal damage, which could result in periadnexal adhesion. As periadnexal adhesion can lead to female infertility due to restricted sweeping of the fimbria over the ovary, it is important to minimize peritoneal damage during the fertility-preserving surgery. Aiming to minimize peritoneal damage, we recently developed a new surgical approach. The techniques used are similar to those used for type III radical hysterectomy; however, all procedures are performed via the extraperitoneal approach.In this video article, we describe a step-by-step technique of this new fertility-preserving surgical procedure. Surgical procedures are as follows: (1) extraperitoneal pelvic lymphadenectomy, (2) excision of the vesicohypogastric fascia and median umbilical ligament, (3) bladder dissection from the peritoneum and identification of uterine cervix, (4) transection of the cardinal ligaments and vesicouterine ligaments, (5) transection of the vagina, (6) excision of the rectovaginal and uterosacral ligaments, (7) transection of the uterine cervix, (8) cervical cerclage and placement of a Foley catheter, (9) anastomosis of the uterine cervix, (10) suture of the median umbilical ligament and vesicohypogastric fascia. During these procedures, the uterine arteries, inferior hypogastric nerve, and pelvic splanchnic nerve were preserved. The advantages of this new surgical approach are first, peritoneal injuries can be completely avoided as the procedure is performed extraperitoneally, and second, it can be carried out using conventional low-cost instruments. In view of these features, we consider that this technique could be an ideal treatment option for selected women with early-stage cervical cancer. The oncological and reproductive outcomes of this new surgical approach need to be evaluated in future clinical studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document