2020 Clinical Engineers Salary Survey

2021 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 165-176
Author(s):  
Michele Manzoli
1987 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leonard D. Goodstein ◽  
◽  
Tori DeAngelis
Keyword(s):  

1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica L. Kohout ◽  
Marlene M. Wicherski
Keyword(s):  

2008 ◽  
Vol 104 (11/12) ◽  
Author(s):  
D.R. Walwyn

Despite the importance of labour and overhead costs to both funders and performers of research in South Africa, there is little published information on the remuneration structures for researchers, technician and research support staff. Moreover, there are widely different pricing practices and perceptions within the public research and higher education institutions, which in some cases do not reflect the underlying costs to the institution or the inherent value of the research. In this article, data from the 2004/5 Research and Development Survey have been used to generate comparative information on the cost of research in various performance sectors. It is shown that this cost is lowest in the higher education institutions, and highest in the business sector, although the differences in direct labour and overheads are not as large as may have been expected. The calculated cost of research is then compared with the gazetted rates for engineers, scientists and auditors performing work on behalf of the public sector, which in all cases are higher than the research sector. This analysis emphasizes the need within the public research and higher education institutions for the development of a common pricing policy and for an annual salary survey, in order to dispel some of the myths around the relative costs of research, the relative levels of overhead ratios and the apparent disparity in remuneration levels.


Author(s):  
Martha Kyrillidou ◽  
Shaneka Morris
Keyword(s):  

2009 ◽  
pp. 17-20
Author(s):  
Les Bland
Keyword(s):  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Masanori Shibata

Dialysis therapy is the predominant choice for renal failure in Japan, and almost 30% of the patients with renal failure have been treated for 10 years or more. Dialysis became the standard procedure to treat renal failure nationwide in the 1980s. However, at that time, managing the increased number of patients on maintenance hemodialysis as well as operating and maintaining the newly developed advanced medical technologies at extensive numbers of clinical sites proved problematic. To help address this, the clinical engineer system was established in 1987 and certain aspects of the clinical engineers’ role remain unique to Japan today. For the last 30 years, clinical engineers have worked as frontline medical personnel not only operating dialysis-related devices but also placing their hands directly on patients when providing care, routinely performing puncture, and administering drugs through the blood circuit under physicians’ instructions. As part of their work, they crucially maintain the use of central dialysis fluid delivery systems (CDDSs) – also unique to Japan – which prepare and deliver a large quantity of dialysis fluid through a central circuit to individual dialysis consoles. CDDSs are widely used because they effectively alleviated the early confusion at clinical sites caused by the rapidly increasing hemodialysis population and the serious shortage in medical personnel. Moreover, clinical engineers alone have the technical ability to provide safe dialysis fluids adjusted to strict standards at clinical sites. In this review article, we focus on the crucial roles that clinical engineers have in maintaining the safety of dialysis-related medical devices and the preparation and delivery of dialysis fluid at many dialysis facilities across the country.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document