Interference Screw With Cortical Button for Distal Biceps Repair

2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 136-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clifford G. Rios ◽  
Augustus D. Mazzocca
2014 ◽  
Vol 23 (10) ◽  
pp. 1532-1536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael C. Cusick ◽  
Benjamin J. Cottrell ◽  
Richard A. Cain ◽  
Mark A. Mighell

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 331-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil R. Oak ◽  
John R. Lien ◽  
Alexander Brunfeldt ◽  
Jeffrey N. Lawton

Background: A fracture through the proximal radius is a theoretical concern after cortical button distal biceps fixation in an active patient. The permanent, nonossified cortical defect and medullary tunnel is at risk during a fall eliciting rotational and compressive forces. We hypothesized that during simulated torsion and compression, in comparison with unaltered specimens, the cortical button distal biceps repair model would have decreased torsional and compressive strength and would fracture in the vicinity of the bicipital tuberosity bone tunnel. Methods: Sixteen fourth-generation composite radius Sawbones models were used in this controlled laboratory study. A bone tunnel was created through the bicipital tuberosity to mimic the exact bone tunnel, 8 mm near cortex and 3.2 mm far cortex, made for the BicepsButton distal biceps tendon repair. The radius was then prepared and mounted on either a torsional or compression testing device and compared with undrilled control specimens. Results: Compression tests resulted in average failure loads of 9015.2 N in controls versus 8253.25 N in drilled specimens ( P = .074). Torsional testing resulted in an average failure torque of 27.3 Nm in controls and 19.3 Nm in drilled specimens ( P = .024). Average fracture angle was 35.1° in controls versus 21.1° in drilled. Gross fracture patterns were similar in compression testing; however, in torsional testing all fractures occurred through the bone tunnel in the drilled group. Conclusion: There are weaknesses in the vicinity of the bone tunnel in the proximal radius during biomechanical stress testing which may not be clinically relevant in nature. Clinical Relevance: In cortical button fixation, distal biceps repairs creates a permanent, nonossified cortical defect with tendon interposed in the bone tunnel, which can alter the biomechanical properties of the proximal radius during compressive and torsional loading.


2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (7_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967119S0036
Author(s):  
Kenneth M. Lin ◽  
Justin Chan ◽  
Brian J. Lin ◽  
Christopher L. Camp ◽  
Grant Hoerig Garcia ◽  
...  

Objectives: While various techniques for distal biceps repair have been described, biomechanical studies have shown cortical button fixation to outperform bone tunnels, intraosseous screws, and suture anchors. Furthermore, numerous studies have shown no difference in complication rate between single- and dual-incision approaches. Thus, it follows that a single-incision approach with cortical button fixation may provide superior clinical outcomes with minimal complications. The purpose of this study is first to investigate intra-operative and short-term complications of distal biceps tendon repair through a single-incision approach using unicortical button fixation, and secondly to assess clinical outcomes. Methods: 52 patients who underwent distal biceps repair with unicortical button fixation (Figure 1) at a single institution from 2014 to 2017 were identified. Exclusion criteria included age less than 18 or greater than 75 years, prior ipsilateral biceps repair, concomitant ipsilateral surgical procedure, and most recent follow-up less than 2 months. Postoperative nerve deficits, flexion and supination strength by manual testing, range of motion, Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and radiographs for identification of heterotopic ossification (HO) were obtained and analyzed retrospectively. Results: Fifty-two patients with 53 distal biceps ruptures were included, with mean age 48 years (range 25-71 years). Median time from injury to surgery was 2 weeks (range 1 day to 16 weeks), with 15 patients being treated at greater than 3 weeks from injury. Forty-four patients (83%) had complete tears. Following surgery, average time to final follow-up was 22.8 weeks (range 8-65 weeks). Postoperatively, 49 patients (92.5%) had full range of motion, 48 patients (90.6%) had return of full supination and flexion strength by manual muscle testing (the remaining patients had strength graded as 5-/5). There was no difference in outcomes between those patients treated < 3 weeks from injury compared to those treated > 3 weeks from injury. Two patients (3.8%) initially reported sensory deficit in the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve distribution, both cases of which fully resolved by 7 and 11 weeks postoperative. Two patients (3.8%) displayed radiographic evidence of heterotopic ossification, Hastings and Graham class I (Figure 2). One of these was an incidental finding without any clinical symptoms, the other had mild pain but normal strength and neurovascular function. Mean postoperative MEPS was 93.9 (range 60-100), corresponding to “excellent” function (MEPS>90). Conclusion: Distal biceps repair using single incision, unicortical button fixation yields a low rate of complications with good clinical results compared to other techniques reported in the literature. The single incision approach in patients treated between 3 and 16 weeks from injury is safe and resulted in outcomes no different than in those patients treated <3 weeks from injury. Further investigation is warranted in the form of larger, comparative studies with more robust outcome measures and longer term follow up. [Figure: see text][Figure: see text]


2008 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 130-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul M. Sethi ◽  
James E. Tibone

2005 ◽  
Vol 6 (2) ◽  
pp. 108-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Augustus D Mazzocca ◽  
James Bicos ◽  
Robert A Arciero ◽  
Anthony A Romeo ◽  
Mark S Cohen ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652098699
Author(s):  
Ainsley L. Taylor ◽  
Ankit Bansal ◽  
Brendan Y. Shi ◽  
Matthew J. Best ◽  
Eric G. Huish ◽  
...  

Background: Various surgical techniques can be used to repair acute distal biceps tendon (DBT) tears; however, it is unknown which type of repair or implant has the greatest biomechanical strength and presents the lowest risk of type 2 failure. Purpose: To identify associations between the type of implant or construct used and the biomechanical performance of DBT repairs in a review of human cadaveric studies. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-regression. Methods: We systematically searched the EMBASE and Medline (PubMed) databases for biomechanical studies that evaluated DBT repair performance in cadaveric specimens. Two independent reviewers extracted data from 14 studies that met our inclusion criteria. The pooled data set was subjected to meta-regression with adjusted failure load (AFL) as the primary outcome variable. Procedural parameters, such as number of sutures, cortices, locking stitches, and whipstitches, served as covariates. Adjusted analysis was performed to determine the differences among implant types. The alpha level was set at .05. Results: When using no implant (bone tunnels) as the referent, no fixation type or procedural parameter was significantly better at predicting AFL. Cortical button fixation had the highest AFL (370 N; 95% CI, −2 to 221). In an implant-to-implant comparison, suture anchor alone was significantly weaker than cortical button (154 N; 95% CI, 30 to 279). Constructs using a cortical button and interference screw were not stronger (as measured by AFL) than those using a cortical button alone. The presence of a locking stitch added 113 N (95% CI, 29 to 196) to the AFL. The use of cortical button instead of interference screws or bone tunnels was associated with lower odds of type 2 failure. Avoiding locking stitches and using more sutures in the construct were also associated with lower odds of type 2 failure. Conclusion: Cortical button fixation is associated with greater construct strength than is suture anchor repair and a lower risk of type 2 failure compared with interference screw fixation or fixation without implants. The addition of an interference screw to cortical button fixation was not associated with increased strength. The presence of a locking stitch added 113 N to the failure load but also increased the odds of type 2 failure.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document