Vertical Skin Paddle Orientation for the Latissimus Dorsi Flap in Breast Reconstruction

2018 ◽  
Vol 141 (3) ◽  
pp. 598-601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Fracol ◽  
Michelle Grim ◽  
Steven T. Lanier ◽  
Neil A. Fine
2019 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-8
Author(s):  
Andrei Ludovic Poroșnicu ◽  
Marius Cotofana ◽  
Alina Ionela Mitcan ◽  
Ina Petrescu

Delayed breast reconstruction after irradiated mastectomy cases includes a large series of reconstructive procedures like silicone implant/expander, numerous flaps or combined methods. Bad status of irradiated tissues needs to find a way to ensure a stable breast feature. Latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap with implant represents one of classical methods of breast reconstruction providing a new breast with superior appearance. The aim of this paper is to present the advantages of breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap and silicone-filled implant. New breast is created by combining the silicone implant placed under pectoralis major muscle and latissimus dorsi myocutaneous flap. Markings of flap is performed with the patients in standing position; first the new inframammary fold and midline and on back the skin paddle is design after a pinch test to check the amount available and the future donor site closure. It is recommended to place the incisions in transverse position so that the scar to be hidden in bra line. The study includes 84 patients who underwent breast reconstruction from April 2014 to April 2016. 57 were latissimus dorsi flap with implant and 5 from which were for salvage another breast reconstruction. The patient’s age was average between 32 and 69 years. The implants used were round shape implants, silicone filled with micro-textured shell. Combination between autologous tissue and implant offer superior appearance of new breast with shape, volume, natural ptosis and consistency similar with normal breast. Also, fast recovering and socio-professional reintegration are the benefits of this method. Analyzing different surgical option, breast reconstruction with latissimusdorsi flap and silicone implant seems to offer very good results with minimum complications in such difficult cases. This method can be suitable for almost all irradiated postmastectomy cases.


2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 349-353 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiro Sowa ◽  
Toshiaki Numajiri ◽  
Ayako Kawarazaki ◽  
Kouichi Sakaguchi ◽  
Tetsuya Taguchi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 229255032110319
Author(s):  
Joshua H. Choo ◽  
Bradley J. Vivace ◽  
Luke T. Meredith ◽  
Swapnil Kachare ◽  
Thomas J. Lee ◽  
...  

Introduction: The increasing prevalence of obesity in patients with breast cancer has prompted a reappraisal of the role of the latissimus dorsi flap (LDF) in breast reconstruction. Although the reliability of this flap in obese patients is well-documented, it is unclear whether sufficient volume can be achieved through a purely autologous reconstruction (eg, extended harvest of the subfascial fat layer). Additionally, the traditional combined autologous and prosthetic approach (LDF + expander/implant) is subject to increased implant-related complication rates related to flap thickness in obese patients. The purpose of this study is to provide data on the thicknesses of the various components of the latissimus flap and discuss the implications for breast reconstruction in patients with increasing body mass index (BMI). Methods: Measurements of back thickness in the usual donor site area of an LDF were obtained in 518 patients undergoing prone computed tomography–guided lung biopsies. Thicknesses of the soft tissue overall and of individual layers (e.g., muscle, subfascial fat) were obtained. Patient, demographics including age, gender, and BMI were obtained. Results: A range of BMI from 15.7 to 65.7 was observed. In females, total back thickness (skin, fat, muscle) ranged from 0.6 to 9.4 cm. Every 1-point increase in BMI resulted in an increase of flap thickness by 1.11 mm (adjusted R 2 of 0.682, P < .001) and an increase in the thickness of the subfascial fat layer by 0.513 mm (adjusted R 2 of 0.553, P < .001). Mean total thicknesses for each weight category were 1.0, 1.7, 2.4, 3.0, 3.6, and 4.5 cm in underweight, normal weight, overweight, and class I, II, III obese individuals, respectively. The average contribution of the subfascial fat layer to flap thickness was 8.2 mm (32%) overall and 3.4 mm (21%), 6.7 mm (29%), 9.0 mm (30%), 11.1 mm (32%), and 15.6 mm (35%) in normal weight, overweight, class I, II, III obese individuals, respectively. Conclusion: The above findings demonstrate that the thickness of the LDF overall and of the subfascial layer closely correlated with BMI. The contribution of the subfascial layer to overall flap thickness tends to increase as a percentage of overall flap thickness with increasing BMI, which is favourable for extended LDF harvests. Because this layer cannot be separated from overall thickness on examination, these results are useful in estimating the amount of additional volume obtained from an extended latissimus harvest technique.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (2) ◽  
pp. 197-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jiajun Feng ◽  
Cleone I Pardoe ◽  
Ashley Manuel Mota ◽  
Christopher Hoe Kong Chui ◽  
Bien-Keem Tan

2007 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 227-231 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. Koller ◽  
S. Gärner ◽  
A. Dobrovits ◽  
R. Kuzbari

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document