scholarly journals A Systematic Literature Review of Intelligent Tutoring Systems With Dialogue in Natural Language

IEEE Access ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 164246-164267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Paladines ◽  
Jaime Ramirez
AI Magazine ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 42-54 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vasile Rus ◽  
Sidney D’Mello ◽  
Xiangen Hu ◽  
Arthur Graesser

We report recent advances in intelligent tutoring systems with conversational dialogue. We highlight progress in terms of macro and microadaptivity. Macroadaptivity refers to a system’s capability to select appropriate instructional tasks for the learner to work on. Microadaptivity refers to a system’s capability to adapt its scaffolding while the learner is working on a particular task. The advances in macro and microadaptivity that are presented here were made possible by the use of learning progressions, deeper dialogue and natural language processing techniques, and by the use of affect-enabled components. Learning progressions and deeper dialogue and natural language processing techniques are key features of DeepTutor, the first intelligent tutoring system based on learning progressions. These improvements extend the bandwidth of possibilities for tailoring instruction to each individual student which is needed for maximizing engagement and ultimately learning.


Author(s):  
Chutima Boonthum-Denecke ◽  
Irwin B. Levinstein ◽  
Danielle S. McNamara ◽  
Joseph P. Magliano ◽  
Keith K. Millis

Many Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITSs) aim to help students become better readers. The computational challenges involved are (1) to assess the students’ natural language inputs and (2) to provide appropriate feedback and guide students through the ITS curriculum. To overcome both challenges, the following non-structural Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques have been explored and the first two are already in use: word-matching (WM), latent semantic analysis (LSA, Landauer, Foltz, & Laham, 1998), and topic models (TM, Steyvers & Griffiths, 2007). This article describes these NLP techniques, the iSTART (Strategy Trainer for Active Reading and Thinking, McNamara, Levinstein, & Boonthum, 2004) intelligent tutor and the related Reading Strategies Assessment Tool (R-SAT, Magliano et al., 2006), and how these NLP techniques can be used in assessing students’ input in iSTART and R-SAT. This article also discusses other related NLP techniques which are used in other applications and may be of use in the assessment tools or intelligent tutoring systems.


Author(s):  
Ani Grubišić ◽  
Slavomir Stankov ◽  
Branko Žitko ◽  
Suzana Tomaš ◽  
Emil Brajković ◽  
...  

Over the last few decades, researchers put efforts to improve intelligent tutoring systems' abilities with the aim to get them as close as possible to the ultimate goal of one-to-one tutoring. CoLaB Tutor and AC-ware Tutor are intelligent tutoring systems based on conceptual knowledge learning and are notable due to the fact they are relatively easy to generalize to multiple knowledge domains. CoLaB Tutor's forte lies in teacher-learner communication in controlled natural language, while AC-ware Tutor focuses on the automatic and dynamic generation of adaptive courseware. In order to compare various intelligent tutoring system supported education environments, in this chapter, the authors summarize several empirical evaluations of CoLaB Tutor and AC-ware Tutor. The results of intelligent tutoring systems' effectiveness in these environments offer the possibility to observe the specific intelligent tutoring system across various education levels, as well as to compare the intelligent tutoring systems' supported education environments.


2000 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christine Mitchel ◽  
Alan Chappell ◽  
W. Gray ◽  
Alex Quinn ◽  
David Thurman

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document