A Hybrid Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithm for Multiobjective Optimization Problems

2013 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-45 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lixin Tang ◽  
Xianpeng Wang
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Dai ◽  
Yuping Wang

In order to well maintain the diversity of obtained solutions, a new multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition of the objective space for multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs) is designed. In order to achieve the goal, the objective space of a MOP is decomposed into a set of subobjective spaces by a set of direction vectors. In the evolutionary process, each subobjective space has a solution, even if it is not a Pareto optimal solution. In such a way, the diversity of obtained solutions can be maintained, which is critical for solving some MOPs. In addition, if a solution is dominated by other solutions, the solution can generate more new solutions than those solutions, which makes the solution of each subobjective space converge to the optimal solutions as far as possible. Experimental studies have been conducted to compare this proposed algorithm with classic MOEA/D and NSGAII. Simulation results on six multiobjective benchmark functions show that the proposed algorithm is able to obtain better diversity and more evenly distributed Pareto front than the other two algorithms.


Author(s):  
Peng Wang ◽  
Changsheng Zhang ◽  
Bin Zhang ◽  
Tingting Liu ◽  
Jiaxuan Wu

Multiobjective density driven evolutionary algorithm (MODdEA) has been quite successful in solving multiobjective optimization problems (MOPs). To further improve its performance and address its deficiencies, this paper proposes a hybrid evolutionary algorithm based on dimensional diversity (DD) and firework explosion (FE). DD is defined to reflect the diversity degree of population dimension. Based on DD, a selection scheme is designed to balance diversity and convergence. A hybrid variation based on FE and genetic operator is designed to facilitate diversity of population. The proposed algorithm is tested on 14 tests problems with diverse characteristics and compared with three state-of-the-art designs. Experimental results show that the proposed design is better or at par with the chosen state-of-the-art algorithms for multiobjective optimization.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document