Evaluating failure in the innovation process: the micropolitics of new product development

1999 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 167-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Oswald Jones ◽  
Gary Stevens
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
New Product

Empirically Testing Factors Increasing Manufacturing Product Innovation Success

2018 ◽  
Vol 15 (02) ◽  
pp. 1850019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tor Guimaraes ◽  
Ketan Paranjape ◽  
Mike Cornick ◽  
Curtis P. Armstrong
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Absorptive Capacity ◽  
Product Innovation ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
New Product ◽  
Competitive Intelligence ◽  
Strategic Leadership ◽  
Management Of Technology ◽  
Proposed Model

Purpose: Important determinants of new product development success fall into five main areas encompassing strategic leadership, competitive intelligence, management of technology, specific characteristics of the company's innovation process, and the company's absorptive capacity to use available knowledge to produce and commercialize new products. Unfortunately the existing knowledge on each of these five areas is not being shared by researchers in the other areas, thus the models are focused on the particular research area. This study tests these constructs as a set of determinants of product innovation success. Design/methodology/approach: A field test using a mailed questionnaire to collect a relatively large sample of manufacturing companies has been used to test the proposed model. To eliminate possible multicollinearity among the independent variables, a multivariate regression analysis was used. Findings: The results provide clear evidence about the importance of competitive intelligence, strategic leadership, competitive intelligence, management of technology, specific characteristics of the company's innovation process, and company absorptive capacity with company success in new product development. Research limitation/implications: Despite the relatively broad scope of the proposed model, other factors may also be important and should be included in future studies. Practical implications: The items used for measuring the main constructs provide further and more specific insights into how managers should go about developing these areas within their organizations. Originality/value: While the study is grounded in the literature of what until now have been five separate areas of knowledge, it proposed a unique integrated model for these areas important to new product development.

The Fuzzy Front End: Concept Development in the Automotive Industry

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christer W. Elverum ◽  
Torgeir Welo ◽  
Martin Steinert
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Automotive Industry ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
New Product ◽  
Product Development Process ◽  
Structured Interviews ◽  
Fuzzy Front End ◽  
Front End

The fuzzy front end (FFE) of new product development (NPD) is a term that refers to the early stages of the innovation process. This paper investigates the FFE in the automotive industry and addresses the challenges of working in this phase of the innovation process, as well as the academic definition of the FFE relative to the real world. Two parts of the innovation process have been identified and characterized as FFE: the concept-work within satellite front-end departments and the work within the pre-development phase of the vehicle new product development process. It has been identified that one of the greatest challenges related to working in the FFE is developing viable concepts that will “sell” internally. Estimating and conveying the overall value of the final product in terms of costs and customer benefits are two of the key elements that make it difficult to achieve internal “buy in”. Furthermore, it is argued that the most common academic perception of the FFE seem to be inadequate since it only concerns work that ends with a go/no-go decision whether to continue into development or not. Consequently, it fails to capture early-stage development work of transformational innovations, where the decision of development has already been made and the uncertainty is related to the execution of the work — and — not the outcome. Semi-structured interviews with a total of eleven employees at seven different automotive OEMs form the basis for the conclusions made herein.

scholarly journals Innovation processes: do they help or hinder new product development outcomes in Irish SMEs?

2016 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 88-103 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Robbins ◽  
Colm O’Gorman
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Diffusion Of Innovation ◽  
Value Chain ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
New Product ◽  
Business Objective ◽  
Formal Innovation ◽  
Innovation Processes

AbstractSmall- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) make a considerable contribution to the development and diffusion of innovation as well as accounting for the bulk of economic activity and employment in Ireland. A formal process for managing the stages of innovation projects is generally cited as a key component of best practice in new product development (NPD). Successfully managing innovation is an important business objective for SMEs, and yet, relatively little is known about how innovation-active firms approach innovation and, specifically, whether firms use formal processes to manage their NPD activities. This study of innovation-active Irish SMEs finds that three quarters of firms report that they do not operate a formal innovation process, yet this is not associated with poorer performance in terms of revenues from new products and services; and there are few differences between firms with formal innovation processes and firms with informal innovation process across each stage of the Innovation Value Chain. Having a more formal innovation process is, however, associated with success at bringing novel products to market. This study contributes to our understanding of the management of innovation in SMEs and to the emerging literature on SMEs that has emphasised both the prevalence and the effectiveness of informal management processes.

DEVELOPMENT OF AN AUDIT TOOL FOR PRODUCT INNOVATION: THE INNOVATION COMPASS

2006 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 1-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
ZOE J. RADNOR ◽  
HANNAH NOKE
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Product Innovation ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
New Product ◽  
Research Process ◽  
Research Projects ◽  
Audit Tool ◽  
Research Project

This paper will present the development of an audit tool called the Innovation Compass. It will show how the tool was formulated through a research project, which was aiming to understand the innovation process within organisations. The creation of the Innovation Compass was driven by the research process and, as this paper will give an example of, validated through its application to case studies. The paper gives a greater understanding of the elements of the tool and, how it could be used and developed in other research projects considering innovation and New Product Development.

External knowledge sourcing and new product development

2017 ◽  
Vol 119 (11) ◽  
pp. 2373-2387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriele Santoro ◽  
Demetris Vrontis ◽  
Alberto Pastore
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Open Innovation ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
New Product ◽  
Incremental Innovation ◽  
Knowledge Sourcing ◽  
Content Type ◽  
External Knowledge ◽  
Npd Performance

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to analyze the role of external knowledge in the innovation process of firms in the food and beverage (F&B) industry and the effects of two external knowledge sourcing modes on new product development (NPD) performance. Design/methodology/approach The paper applies a quantitative approach, relying on data from 157 Italian firms operating in the F&B industry to test the hypotheses through OLS regression models. Findings Results suggest that the surveyed firms actively engage in open innovation with strong ties with market-based sources. Moreover, the authors found that market-based sources are associated with income from incremental innovation and time to market, while science-based sources are associated with income from radical innovation. Finally, the authors found that the R&D intensity enhances the benefits of the above external knowledge sourcing modes. Originality/value Despite the large amount of studies assessing the effects of external knowledge sourcing on performance in the open innovation field, few studies focused on a specific industry, especially with regard to F&B. Moreover, this paper considers different types of NPD performance measures given that different external knowledge sourcing modes exert different effects.

WHY AND HOW TO INVOLVE PURCHASING IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT?

2020 ◽  
pp. 2150027
Author(s):  
HOLGER SCHIELE ◽  
ERWIN HOFMAN ◽  
BERND MARKUS ZUNK ◽  
JUSTUS EGGERS
Keyword(s):  
Product Development ◽  
New Product Development ◽  
Corporate Culture ◽  
Innovation Process ◽  
Decisive Role ◽  
New Product ◽  
Management Support ◽  
Structural Differentiation ◽  
Top Management Support ◽  
Supplier Integration

In new product development (NPD) firms increasingly have to rely on external expertise from suppliers. However, results of early supplier integration have been found to be ambiguous. This research empirically tests the hypothesis that the participation of professional purchasing agents early on in the supplier integration process plays a decisive role to distinguish successful projects. Our sample gave evidence that early supply management integration positively moderated supplier involvement’s effect on firm success. Hence, firms may benefit from avoiding supplier integration without professional purchasing management. Still, in many firms the procurement department is not yet integrated in NPD processes early on. Our research identifies four measures those firms applied, in which purchasing got fully embedded in the innovation process: top-management support, structural differentiation, explicit processes, and a collaborative corporate culture. This finding can serve as blue print for implementing purchasing integration and therewith improve the success of supplier integration in NPD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document