Outcomes following conversion of a percutaneous to a transcutaneous bone conduction device in eight children

2017 ◽  
Vol 42 (4) ◽  
pp. 917-920 ◽  
Author(s):  
S.D. Carr ◽  
I.A. Bruce ◽  
D. Jones ◽  
J. Ray
2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (7) ◽  
pp. 1151-1156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roman D. Laske ◽  
Christof Röösli ◽  
Flurin Pfiffner ◽  
Dorothe Veraguth ◽  
Alex M. Huber

2018 ◽  
Vol 370 ◽  
pp. 94-104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ivo Dobrev ◽  
Jae Hoon Sim ◽  
Flurin Pfiffner ◽  
Alexander M. Huber ◽  
Christof Röösli

2018 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 1603-1606 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Loader ◽  
Elisabeth Sterrer ◽  
Caroline Reichmayr ◽  
Alexandra Kaider ◽  
Wolfang Gstöttner ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 372 ◽  
pp. 62-68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martijn J.H. Agterberg ◽  
Ad F.M. Snik ◽  
Rens M.G. Van de Goor ◽  
Myrthe K.S. Hol ◽  
A. John Van Opstal

2013 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 927-934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ralf Siegert ◽  
Jan Kanderske

2013 ◽  
Vol 127 (12) ◽  
pp. 1214-1221 ◽  
Author(s):  
W S S Tsang ◽  
J K Y Yu ◽  
K S S Bhatia ◽  
T K C Wong ◽  
M C F Tong

AbstractFor over three decades, bone conduction hearing aids have been changing the lives of patients with impaired hearing. The size, appearance and fitting discomfort of early generations of bone conduction hearing aids made them unpopular. The advent of bone-anchored hearing aids in the 1970s offered patients improved sound quality and fitting comfort, due to the application of osseointegration. However, the issue of post-operative peri-abutment pin tract wound infection persisted. The Bonebridge system incorporates the first active bone conduction device, and aims to resolve peri-abutment issues. Implantation of this system in an Asian patient is presented.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
KD Sakmen ◽  
T Stöver ◽  
M Leinung ◽  
M Diensthuber ◽  
S Helbig ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document