quantitative evaluation
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

8314
(FIVE YEARS 1354)

H-INDEX

106
(FIVE YEARS 13)

Geothermics ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 100 ◽  
pp. 102335
Author(s):  
Yanliang Li ◽  
Jianming Peng ◽  
Ling Zhang ◽  
Jian Zhou ◽  
Chaoyang Huang ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 128 (2) ◽  
pp. e63-e64
Author(s):  
A.J. Shrimpton ◽  
J.M. Brown ◽  
T.M. Cook ◽  
J.R. Reid ◽  
B.R. Bzdek ◽  
...  

2022 ◽  
Vol 270 ◽  
pp. 85-91
Author(s):  
Hyuma A. Leland ◽  
Jennifer S. Kim ◽  
Ido Badash ◽  
Karen E. Burtt ◽  
Alexis D. Rounds ◽  
...  

Agriculture ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 113
Author(s):  
Youzhu Li ◽  
Rui He ◽  
Jinsi Liu ◽  
Chongguang Li ◽  
Jason Xiong

The authors found some omissions and errors in the original paper [...]


2022 ◽  
Vol 6 (GROUP) ◽  
pp. 1-24
Author(s):  
Samiha Samrose ◽  
Ehsan Hoque

Since online discussion platforms can limit the perception of social cues, effective collaboration over videochat requires additional attention to conversational skills. However, self-affirmation and defensive bias theories indicate that feedback may appear confrontational, especially when users are not motivated to incorporate them. We develop a feedback chatbot that employs Motivational Interviewing (MI), a directive counseling method that encourages commitment to behavior change, with the end goal of improving the user's conversational skills. We conduct a within-subject study with 21 participants in 8 teams to evaluate our MI-agent 'MIA' and a non-MI-agent 'Roboto'. After interacting with an agent, participants are tasked with conversing over videochat to evaluate candidate résumés for a job circular. Our quantitative evaluation shows that the MI-agent effectively motivates users, improves their conversational skills, and is likable. Through a qualitative lens, we present the strategies and the cautions needed to fulfill individual and team goals during group discussions. Our findings reveal the potential of the MI technique to improve collaboration and provide examples of conversational tactics important for optimal discussion outcomes.


2022 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 64
Author(s):  
Giedrė Beconytė ◽  
Andrius Balčiūnas ◽  
Aurelija Šturaitė ◽  
Rita Viliuvienė

This paper proposes a method for quantitative evaluation of perception deviations due to generalization in choropleth maps. The method proposed is based on comparison of class values assigned to different aggregation units chosen for representing the same dataset. It is illustrated by the results of application of the method to population density maps of Lithuania. Three spatial aggregation levels were chosen for comparison: the 1 × 1 km statistical grid, elderships (NUTS3), and municipalities (NUTS2). Differences in density class values between the reference grid map and the other two maps were calculated. It is demonstrated that a perceptual fallacy on the municipality level population map of Lithuania leads to a misinterpretation of data that makes such maps frankly useless. The eldership level map is, moreover, also largely misleading, especially in sparsely populated areas. The method proposed is easy to use and transferable to any other field where spatially aggregated data are mapped. It can be used for visual analysis of the degree to which a generalized choropleth map is liable to mislead the user in particular areas.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document