scholarly journals Individual Differences and the Development of Joint Attention in Infancy

2007 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 938-954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Mundy ◽  
Jessica Block ◽  
Christine Delgado ◽  
Yuly Pomares ◽  
Amy Vaughan Van Hecke ◽  
...  
1998 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 407-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul B. Baltes

Experiential factors such as long-term deliberate practice are powerful and necessary conditions for outstanding achievement. Nevertheless, to be able to reject the role of biology based individual differences (including genetic ones) in the manifestation of talent requires designs that expose heterogeneous samples to so-called testing-the-limits conditions, allowing asymptotic levels of performance to be analyzed comparatively. When such research has been conducted, as in the field of lifespan cognition, individual differences, including biology based ones, come to the fore and demonstrate that the orchestration of excellence requires joint attention to genetic–biological and experiential factors.


Infancy ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. 587-610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth Meins ◽  
Charles Fernyhough ◽  
Bronia Arnott ◽  
Lucia Vittorini ◽  
Michelle Turner ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 29 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Morales ◽  
Peter Mundy ◽  
Mary Crowson ◽  
A. Rebecca Neal ◽  
Christine Delgado

Autism ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 23 (7) ◽  
pp. 1720-1731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laudan B Jahromi ◽  
Yanru Chen ◽  
Andrew J Dakopolos ◽  
Alice Chorneau

This study examined delay of gratification behaviors in preschool-aged children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Recent research has found that elementary-aged children with autism spectrum disorder showed challenges with delay of gratification and that there were individual differences in terms of children’s behaviors during the wait. We extend this work to a younger sample of children with autism spectrum disorder to understand whether these difficulties emerge by the preschool years. Moreover, we assessed whether individual differences in other key self-regulatory capacities (i.e. effortful control, emotion regulation, executive function, and joint attention) were related to delay of gratification wait durations or behavioral strategies. Findings revealed that preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder waited for a shorter duration, demonstrated more temptation-focused behaviors, and expressed less positive affect than their typical peers during the delay of gratification task. At the full-sample level, individual differences in children’s temptation-focused behaviors (i.e. visual attention and verbalizations focused on the temptation) were related to children’s executive function, joint attention, and parents’ ratings of emotion regulation. When we examined associations within groups, the associations were not significant for the autism spectrum disorder group, but for typically developing children, there was a positive association between temptation-focused behaviors and emotion regulation.


2012 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-197 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jed T. Elison ◽  
Jason J. Wolff ◽  
Debra C. Heimer ◽  
Sarah J. Paterson ◽  
Hongbin Gu ◽  
...  

2000 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. 302-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Markus ◽  
Peter Mundy ◽  
Michael Morales ◽  
Christine E. F. Delgado ◽  
Marygrace Yale

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesco Willemse ◽  
Abdulaziz Abubshait ◽  
Agnieszka Wykowska

Leading another person’s gaze to establish joint attention facilitates social interaction. Previously it was found that we look back at agents who engage in joint attention frequently and more quickly than agents who display this behaviour less often. This paper serves to fill in two knowledge gaps on the topic. Firstly, we examine whether this looking-back behaviour is replicated by a manual response. In an online, eyetracker-free task in which participant were asked to select one of two objects, one robot identity followed the selection most of the time, whilst the other looked at the other object most of the time. Participants moved back to the robot more quickly if the robot which most of the time followed their movement looked at the same object relative to when it did not. We found no such difference for the robot which most of the time did not follow participants. Secondly, we used the current datasets and datasets from prior experiments to look into how individual differences in autistic traits and readiness to adopt the intentional stance toward artificial agents affect how participants’ behaviour changed over time during the experiments. The results showed that individual differences in adopting the intentional stance influenced participants’ motor responses overtime, but not their gaze behaviour. Taken together, this indicates that whereas individual differences may not fully predicate reflexive social behaviour, its evoked gaze behaviour is likely coupled with motor actions.


2010 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-393 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth A. Gaffan ◽  
Carla Martins ◽  
Sarah Healy ◽  
Lynne Murray

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document