Prevalence of child and adolescent psychiatric disorders: the Zürich Epidemiological Study

1998 ◽  
Vol 98 (4) ◽  
pp. 262-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
H.-C. Steinhausen ◽  
C. Winkler Metzke ◽  
M. Meier ◽  
R. Kannenberg
2010 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 642
Author(s):  
B. Vicente ◽  
F. de la Barra ◽  
S. Saldivia ◽  
P. Rioseco ◽  
R. Melipillan

2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sigita Lesinskiene ◽  
Sigita Girdzijauskiene ◽  
Grazina Gintiliene ◽  
Dovile Butkiene ◽  
Dainius Puras ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 47 (7) ◽  
pp. 1099-1109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin Vicente ◽  
Flora de la Barra ◽  
Sandra Saldivia ◽  
Robert Kohn ◽  
Pedro Rioseco ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 80 (10) ◽  
pp. 826-831 ◽  
Author(s):  
Praveen Khairkar ◽  
Chandrashekhar Pathak ◽  
Bhawna Lakhkar ◽  
Rupali Sarode ◽  
Jayant Vagha ◽  
...  

2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (S1) ◽  
pp. 911-912
Author(s):  
Falissard B.

Psychiatrists, like most physicians, are fascinated by their classifications. Like art critics that distinguish surrealists, cubists, hyperrealists, minimalists, etc. psychiatrists try to reveal patterns of symptoms, emotions or behaviors from the patients they see in their day-to-day practice. But psychiatric disorders are not used and determined only by psychiatrists. As pointed by P. Zachar (2015), psychiatric disorders can be considered as biological dysfunction, patterns of symptoms helpful for treatment and prognosis, categories used by health insurances, categories used by judges, words used in the media, concepts used by sociologists (“The weariness of the self”, Alain Eherenberg).We will discuss in the conference what science can say about this confusion and what clinicians should consider for their clinical practice.Disclosure of interestThe author has not supplied his declaration of competing interest.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document