Acellular dermal matrix graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage in smokers: a randomized clinical study

2012 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. 393-399 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana B. Alves ◽  
Priscila P. Costa ◽  
Sérgio Luís Scombatti de Souza ◽  
Márcio F. de Moraes Grisi ◽  
Daniela B. Palioto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Enamel Matrix Derivative ◽  
Enamel Matrix ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Acellular Dermal ◽  
Matrix Derivative

A Comparative Study of Root Coverage Using Acellular Dermal Matrix With and Without Enamel Matrix Derivative

2007 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 411-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Ho Shin ◽  
Marco A. Cueva ◽  
David G. Kerns ◽  
William W. Hallmon ◽  
Francisco Rivera-Hidalgo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Enamel Matrix Derivative ◽  
Enamel Matrix ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Acellular Dermal ◽  
Matrix Derivative

scholarly journals Regenerative Potential of Enamel Matrix Protein Derivative and Acellular Dermal Matrix for Gingival Recession: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Proteomes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 11
Author(s):  
Muhammad Saad Shaikh ◽  
Mohid Abrar Lone ◽  
Hesham Matabdin ◽  
Muneeb Ahmed Lone ◽  
Azeem Hussain Soomro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Matrix Protein ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Gingival Recession ◽  
Enamel Matrix ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Keratinized Tissue ◽  
Enamel Matrix Protein ◽  
Acellular Dermal

Objective: The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical effectiveness of using a combination of enamel matrix protein derivative and acellular dermal matrix in comparison to acellular dermal matrix alone for treating gingival recessions. Methods: The Cochrane Library (Wiley), PubMed by Medline (NLM), Medline (EBSCO), and Embase (Ovid) databases were searched for entries up to April 2020. Only clinical trials were included. Primary outcomes were root coverage (%), changes in keratinized tissue width and recession (mm). Meta-analysis was conducted for root coverage, changes in keratinized tissue width, recession, clinical attachment level and probing depth. Results: Four studies were selected for the analysis. In primary outcomes, root coverage, change in keratinized tissue width and recession analysis showed a mean difference of 4.99% (p = 0.11), 0.20 mm (p = 0.14) and 0.13 mm (p = 0.23) respectively between the two groups. Secondary outcomes analysis also exhibited a statistically insignificant difference between the test and control group with mean difference of 0.11 mm (p = 0.32) in clinical attachment level gain and -0.03 mm (p = 0.29) in probing depth reduction analysis. Conclusions: Within the limits of this study, enamel matrix protein derivative combined with acellular dermal matrix used for treating gingival recession defects resulted in no beneficial effect clinically than acellular dermal matrix only.

A 6-Month Comparative Clinical Study of a Conventional and a New Surgical Approach for Root Coverage With Acellular Dermal Matrix

2004 ◽  
Vol 75 (10) ◽  
pp. 1350-1356 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raquel R.M. Barros ◽  
Arthur B. Novaes ◽  
Márcio F.M. Grisi ◽  
Sérgio L.S. Souza ◽  
Mário Taba ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Study ◽  
Surgical Approach ◽  
Acellular Dermal Matrix ◽  
Root Coverage ◽  
Dermal Matrix ◽  
Comparative Clinical Study ◽  
Acellular Dermal
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document