The Role of Pavlovian Conditioning in the Acquisition of Food Likes and Dislikes

1985 ◽  
Vol 443 (1 Experimental) ◽  
pp. 189-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
PAUL ROZIN ◽  
DEBRA ZELLNER
1986 ◽  
Vol 88 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allan P. Shapiro ◽  
Peter E. Nathan

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefano Ghirlanda ◽  
Magnus Enquist

A defining feature of Pavlovian conditioning is that the unconditioned stimulus (US) is delivered whether or not the animal performs a conditioned response (CR). This has lead to the question: Does CR performance play any role in learning? Between the 1930's and 1970's, a consensus emerged that CR acquisition is driven by CS-US experiences, and that CRs play a minimal role, if any. Here we revisit the question and present two new quantitative methods to evaluate whether CRs influence the course of learning. Our results suggest that CRs play an important role in Pavlovian acquisition, in such paradigms as rabbit eyeblink conditioning, pigeon autoshaped key pecking, and rat autoshaped lever pressing and magazine entry.


1986 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher G. Gentile ◽  
Theodore W. Jarrell ◽  
Alan Teich ◽  
Philip M. McCabe ◽  
Neil Schneiderman

2012 ◽  
Vol 226 (3) ◽  
pp. 491-499 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samanta M. March ◽  
Paula Abate ◽  
Norman E. Spear ◽  
Juan Carlos Molina

2007 ◽  
Vol 185 (2) ◽  
pp. 199-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Steele-Russell ◽  
M. I. Russell ◽  
J. A. Castiglioni ◽  
B. Setlow ◽  
T. Werka

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franz R. Villaruel ◽  
Melissa Martins ◽  
Nadia Chaudhri

ABSTRACTThe capacity to suppress learned responses is essential for animals to adapt in dynamic environments. Extinction is a process by which animals learn to suppress conditioned responding when an expected outcome is omitted. The infralimbic cortex (IL) to nucleus accumbens shell (NAcS) neural circuit is implicated in suppressing conditioned responding after extinction, especially in the context of operant cocaine-seeking behaviour. However, the role of the IL-to-NAcS neural circuit in the extinction of responding to appetitive Pavlovian cues is unknown and the psychological mechanisms involved in response suppression following extinction are unclear. We trained rats to associate a 10 s auditory conditioned stimulus (CS; 14 trials per session) with a sucrose unconditioned stimulus (US; 0.2 mL per CS) in a specific context and then, following extinction in a different context, precipitated a renewal of CS responding by presenting the CS alone in the original Pavlovian conditioning context. Unilateral, optogenetic stimulation of the IL-to-NAcS circuit selectively during CS trials suppressed renewal. In a separate experiment, IL-to-NAcS stimulation suppressed CS responding regardless of prior extinction and impaired extinction retrieval. Finally, IL-to-NAcS stimulation during the CS did not suppress the acquisition of Pavlovian conditioning but was required for the subsequent expression of CS responding. These results are consistent with multiple studies showing that the IL-to-NAcS neural circuit is involved in the suppression of operant cocaine-seeking, extending these findings to appetitive Pavlovian cues. The suppression of appetitive Pavlovian responding following IL-to-NAcS circuit stimulation does not, however, appear to require an extinction-dependent process.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENTExtinction is a form of inhibitory learning through which animals learn to suppress conditioned responding in the face of non-reinforcement. We investigated the role of infralimbic (IL) cortex inputs to the nucleus accumbens shell (NAcS) in the extinction of responding to appetitive Pavlovian cues and the psychological mechanisms involved in response suppression following extinction. Using in vivo optogenetics, we found that stimulating the IL-to-NAcS neural circuit suppressed context-induced renewal of conditioned responding after extinction. In a separate experiment, stimulating the IL-to-NAcS circuit suppressed conditioned responding in an extinction-independent manner. These findings can be leveraged by future research aimed at understanding how corticostriatal circuits contribute to behavioural flexibility and mental disorders that involve the suppression of learned behaviours.


1986 ◽  
Vol 374 (1) ◽  
pp. 126-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Theodore W. Jarrell ◽  
Christopher G. Gentile ◽  
Philip M. McCabe ◽  
Neil Schneiderman

2000 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 269-276
Author(s):  
Michael Domjan ◽  
Brian Cusato ◽  
Ronald Villarreal

Reactions to the target article included requests for extensions and elaborations of the schema we proposed and discussions of apparent shortcomings of our approach. In general, we welcome suggestions for extension of the schema to additional kinds of social behavior and to forms of learning other than Pavlovian conditioning. Many of the requested elaborations of the schema are consistent with our approach, but some may limit its generality. Many of the apparent shortcomings that commentators discussed do not seem problematic. Our schema encourages a broad view of the behavioral consequences of Pavlovian conditioning – including learned modifications of responding to the unconditioned stimulus. Costs and benefits addressed by our schema are the long-range reproductive consequences of learning – not the immediate reinforcing consequences of particular conditioned responses. Our approach allows the evolution of learning to yield maladaptive behavior and can be extended to characterize dynamic social interactions. We clarify that ours is not a homeostatic model involving ideal set points, and we clarify and defend our application of Pavlovian concepts to the analysis of social play.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document